Thus spake "Cheung, Rick" <Rick.Cheung@NextelPartners.com>
> Has anyone implemented EIGRP's traffic-share balanced command to
> load balance across unequal cost paths in a bandwidth proportional basis?
> Does this conflict with per packet switching? Also, would this affect VoIP
> traffic on those paths?
My experience with unequal cost load balancing is that careless configuration
can lead to routing loops. Used properly, it usually works. It is compatible
with CEF per-dest and per-packet load balancing.
At a minimum, per-packet load balancing will introduce extra jitter, which may
affect voice quality (depending on your endpoints). Per-packet is also
incompatible with RTP Header Compression.
S
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun Aug 04 2002 - 04:12:04 EDT