Re: [nsp] RSP/VIP performance question

From: Mike Horwath (drechsau@tiny.net)
Date: Tue Sep 07 1999 - 15:22:09 EDT

Next message: Deepak Jain: "Re: [nsp] RSP/VIP performance question"
Previous message: Mike Gibbs: "[nsp] Cisco to Bay Vlans"
In reply to: Simon Lockhart: "Re: [nsp] RSP/VIP performance question"
Next in thread: Deepak Jain: "Re: [nsp] RSP/VIP performance question"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

On Tue, Sep 07, 1999 at 08:16:43PM +0100, Simon Lockhart wrote:
>
> >RSP2 is 100Mhz processor, RSP4 is 200Mhz.
>
> >VIP2-40 is 100Mhz processor, VIP2-50 is 200Mhz.
>
> Yup, I'd got that from the product specs, but what does that mean in
> real terms?

Almost double the PPS for the VIP2-50.

For the RSP 4, it means a full BGP load takes about 1/2 the time.

-- 
Mike Horwath  Admin & Manager @ VISI.com   WORK: drechsau@visi.com
IRC: Drechsau     http://www.visi.com/     HOME: drechsau@geeks.org
The only Minnesota ISP with public statistics: http://noc.visi.com/
         Garbage In -- Gospel Out. - berkeley fortune(6)

Next message: Deepak Jain: "Re: [nsp] RSP/VIP performance question"
Previous message: Mike Gibbs: "[nsp] Cisco to Bay Vlans"
In reply to: Simon Lockhart: "Re: [nsp] RSP/VIP performance question"
Next in thread: Deepak Jain: "Re: [nsp] RSP/VIP performance question"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun Aug 04 2002 - 04:12:05 EDT