> I thought that the RFC didn't specify this? I'm sure that GateD's behavior
> was different to IOS.
The RFC specifies that the last tie-breaker is the router with the
lower-numbered identifier, and IOS and gated both work that way.
IOS may be doing better in tracking drafts that gated; that would
account for differences, if true.
Stephen
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun Aug 04 2002 - 04:12:06 EDT