On Mon, 4 Oct 1999, Pierre-Etienne Chartier wrote:
> Hi,
> I think it's not just a problem of auto-negociation. I've had the
> same problems with Sun Ultra 10s and 100FDX simply didn't work, even set
> manually.
> This could be attributed to Sun's drivers, though I'm not sure...
>
> Thanks,
> Pierre-Etienne Chartier
>
>
did thise Ultra-10 have uptdate PROM's ?
---
(from sun infodoc 16728 - which I attached to a previoius mail )
4. missing Ultra Flash PROM Update.
patches 104169 Hardware/PROM: Ultra 2 Standalone Flash PROM Update
patches 104288 Hardware/PROM: Ultra 1E Standalone Flash PROM Update
patches 104881 Hardware/PROM: Ultra 1 (non-E) Standalone Flash PROM Update
patches 105930 Hardware/PROM: Ultra 30 Standalone Flash PROM Update
patches 106121 Hardware/PROM: Ultra 5/10 Standalone Flash PROM Update
patches 106122 Hardware/PROM: Enterprise 450 / Ultra 450 Standalone Flash
PROM Update
patches 103346 Hardware/PROM: Ultra Enterprise 3x00/4x00/5x00/6x00 UNIX flashprom update
5. missing hme driver patch.
patches 102979 SunOS 5.5: hme driver patch
patches 104212 SunOS 5.5.1: /kernel/drv/hme patch
patches 105795 SunOS 5.6: /kernel/drv/hme patch
--
Rafi Sadowsky rafi@oumail.openu.ac.il
Network/System/Security VoiceMail: +972-3-646-0592 FAX: +972-3-646-5410
Mangler ( :-) | member ILAN-CERT(CERT@CERT.AC.IL)
Open University of Israel | (PGP key -> ) http://telem.openu.ac.il/~rafi
> > If there was an information revolution, it's over: <
> > information won. <
> > -Diana Lady Dougan <
> >--------------------------------------------------------------------<
> >Pierre-Etienne Chartier <
> >Systems Analyst, Logibro, inc. <
> >+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=++=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+<
>
> On Mon, 4 Oct 1999, Wade Williams wrote:
>
> >
> >
> > > "Am I doing something wrong? The very same Sun (as I've pointed out later)
> > > autonegotiates very nicely with 3com switch, meaning that there is NOTHING
> > > wrong with NIC's drivers. So I make an assumption that there is something
> > > wrong with the catalyst switch, as it's behaving erratically in
> > > my opinion"
> >
> >
> > While I'm no expert in it, I've been told that when autonegotiation started,
> > there were no standards. Although there are some standards defined, I think
> > they might still leave a lot of room for interpretation.
> >
> > The end result is, it's always hit and miss. That Sun may work perfectly
> > with the 3Com, but you may hook a PC up that has a brand XYZ NIC in it and
> > it might not work with the 3Com but may work flawlessly with the Cisco.
> >
> > In short, rather than chasing around trying to find the perfect NIC's that
> > work with the perfect switches, I think most people just set both ends
> > manually and go work on something else.
I agree - in general it's probably a good idea to fix one side -
even if the auto-negotation with no forcing works OK
> >
> > Wade
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > Wade Williams "Put your message in a modem, and throw
> > Systems Engineer, CCIE #3373 it in the cyber sea."
> > Cisco Systems, Inc. - N. Peart
> > Brentwood, TN
> > 615-221-2918
> > wwilliam@cisco.com
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >
> >
>
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun Aug 04 2002 - 04:12:06 EDT