[nsp] question on the routing statement.

• Next message: Ryan O'Connell: "Re: [nsp] question on the routing statement."
• Previous message: Bob's Lists: "RE: [nsp] BGP Multihoming -how to announce backup route???"
• Next in thread: Ryan O'Connell: "Re: [nsp] question on the routing statement."
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
• Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

Cisco-nsp,

Say there are two serial interfaces, s0/0 and s0/1
and there are ip address 1.1.1.1/32 and 2.1.1.1/32
respectivefully..

then I have route statments saying
ip route 3.0.0.0/24 1.1.1.2
ip route 3.0.0.0/24 2.1.1.2

here is the question of the day, if I use IP addresses of
the next hop, I noticed EVEN if the interface is down.
why? It does not make sence.

I KNOW I can use serial interfaces dest. route.
but it does not make sence to show unreachable interface as option.
Why?? could someone explain to me ..

TIA,

Tatsuya

/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/
Tatsuya Kawasaki
Allegiance Telecom
Unlock the Power of the Internet
http://www.kivex.com
Phone 301.215.6777 Fax 301.215.5991
Affiliation given for identification not representation
/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/

• Next message: Ryan O'Connell: "Re: [nsp] question on the routing statement."
• Previous message: Bob's Lists: "RE: [nsp] BGP Multihoming -how to announce backup route???"
• Next in thread: Ryan O'Connell: "Re: [nsp] question on the routing statement."
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
• Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun Aug 04 2002 - 04:13:24 EDT