On Wed, Dec 12, 2001 at 08:38:30AM +0100, KF wrote:
> And what about latency? Isn't it increasing ? Can't afford it on our BB...
>
If you had to pick between increased latency and better throughput, or
lower latency and less throughput, which would you pick? You already
have mechanisms to make this choice on an IP network (IGP knobs, BGP
knobs, static routes, GRE tunnels, other hacks). MPLS-TE is just
another tool in the toolbox.
And yes, QoS - WRED, WFQ, all that stuff, still applies. MPLS-TE does
nothing to increase or reduce the efficacy of QoS (and by Q I mean
Quality, not Quantity) on a backbone.
eric
> greetz
>
> Alex
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Nick [mailto:nick@arc.net.my]
> Sent: Wednesday, December 12, 2001 1:59 AM
> To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
> Subject: [nsp] MPLS setup
>
>
> We run a small/medium ISP here with 5 PoPs and were flirting with the idea
> of running MPLS more for TE than QoS or VPN. Can I believe all the hype on
> MPLS and the wonders it promises. Are there any good resources/books for
> ISPs - a lot of the resources/books are more for IP-VPN. Or am I going the
> wrong way. Has any one successfully deployed MPLS in an ISP environment?
>
> Any hints/pointers/time of day is much appreciated.
>
> Regards,
>
> -nick
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun Aug 04 2002 - 04:13:25 EDT