mbgp was fairly broken until 12.1(8a)E5.
(the inability to redistribute connected or static routes into
bgp that is).
You probally want to look at using that on the 6509
at least.
- jared
On Fri, Jan 04, 2002 at 12:38:48AM -0800, Benjie Ko wrote:
> Hasnt anyone here implemented PVLANs? I have a 6509
> and a 3548XL. The purpose here is to setup a
> maintenance network wherein customers can access their
> server from a maintenance console. Since we have
> multiple customer servers, Im trying to prevent them
> to communicate via layer 2. However, the maintenance
> consoles can talk to the customer servers.This is the
> reason why I want to use PVLANs.
> The customer servers and the maintenance consoles are
> connected on the 3548s. The 3548s in turn are
> connected via an ISL trunk to the 6509.
> 6509 is running native IOS 12.1(8a)EX. 3548 is running
> 12.0(5.2)XU.
> If PVLANs wont work with my setup, then can you
> recommend a workable solution?
>
>
> --- Stephen Sprunk <ssprunk@cisco.com> wrote:
> > Thus spake "Benjie Ko" <gerwalk1@yahoo.com>
> > > But switches should be in transparent mode to
> > > implement vlans....Is it right to say that I will
> > have
> > > to manually add the primary and secondary VLANS on
> > all
> > > my 3548s and allow the vlans on the trunk
> > interfaces?
> >
> > Why do you think the switches need to be in VTP
> > Transparent mode? The whole
> > point of VTP is to obviate the need to configure the
> > same VLAN settings on
> > every switch.
> >
> > S
> >
>
>
> __________________________________________________
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Send your FREE holiday greetings online!
> http://greetings.yahoo.com
-- Jared Mauch | pgp key available via finger from jared@puck.nether.net clue++; | http://puck.nether.net/~jared/ My statements are only mine.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun Aug 04 2002 - 04:13:27 EDT