RE: [nsp] [nsp] performance of an IO-GE+E vs PA-GE

• Next message: Junichi Imamura: "[nsp] 802.1q traffic collect"
• Previous message: Chris Whyte: "RE: [nsp] GSR Engine 1/2/3/4? huh?"
• Maybe in reply to: Kinczli Zoltán: "[nsp] [nsp] performance of an IO-GE+E vs PA-GE"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
• Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

Yes, it's NPE-1G, Q1/Q2, promising 800-1000 kpps

--zoltan

-----Eredeti üzenet-----
Feladó: Jared Mauch [mailto:jared@puck.nether.net]
Küldve: 2002. január 30. 21:35
Címzett: Kinczli Zoltán
Másolatot kap: Adrian Mardlin; cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Tárgy: Re: [nsp] [nsp] performance of an IO-GE+E vs PA-GE

On Wed, Jan 30, 2002 at 04:56:05PM +0100, Kinczli Zoltán wrote:
> Hello Adrian,
>
> Thanks for your input, but according to an independent test, with
> 12.1(5)T
> 8000 sessions has been demonstrated. (pppoA/pppoE) but the peek load
was
> 100Mbps,
> see attachment.
>
> From other hand, as with 12.2(4)B there is PXF support for L2TP.
>
> Anybody out there running a 720xVXR with an io-ge, who can tell me
> if it performs over 200mbps fdx or not?

        It will perform but very high cpu.

        I'm sure cisco has something in the works that will allow
the 7200 VXR to do full gig-e.

        - Jared

• Next message: Junichi Imamura: "[nsp] 802.1q traffic collect"
• Previous message: Chris Whyte: "RE: [nsp] GSR Engine 1/2/3/4? huh?"
• Maybe in reply to: Kinczli Zoltán: "[nsp] [nsp] performance of an IO-GE+E vs PA-GE"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
• Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun Aug 04 2002 - 04:13:30 EDT