<snip>
min/avg/max = 1/1/1 ms which perfect. What can be the reason of the poor
telnet responce? Does this mean that the tunnelling performance is low? Is
there a workaround?
<snip>
I've worked with tunneling on 7200's->2600's, and have noticed that in real
life 5-6mbit/s will hose the 2600. I would in that case ask, what kind of
routers are you using to terminate the tunnels? From what I've seen,
smaller packets [pings] making it just fine, whereas traffic to the router
itself could be quite lagged, if you even establish a connection. Try
changing your datagram size to 1500, and see if the pings make it through at
1ms.
/mt
"The information transmitted is intended only for the person or entity to
which it is addressed and may contain confidential and/or privileged
material. Any review, retransmission, dissemination or other use of, or
taking of any action in reliance upon, this information by persons or
entities other than the intended recipient is prohibited. If you received
this in error, please contact the sender and delete the material from all
computers."
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun Aug 04 2002 - 04:13:31 EDT