SV: SV: [nsp] VRF routing / smaller boxes?

From: Jan Gunnik Hope (Jan.Gunnik.Hope@idcomnet.no)
Date: Wed Feb 06 2002 - 17:23:14 EST


We use c3640-jk8s-mz.122-1.bin

Also remember to look out for CEF problems on
the .1Q interfaces, i.e.
        no ip route-cache
on the FastEthernet's, as I mentioned in another thread.
Sometimes everything look fine doing the local pings,
and then some destinations gets shaky.

If someone has a bugID on that problem, I sure would like
to know...

jgh

-----Opprinnelig melding-----
Fra: Gert Doering [mailto:gert@greenie.muc.de]
Sendt: 6. februar 2002 17:00
Til: Jan Gunnik Hope; Gert Doering; cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Emne: Re: SV: [nsp] VRF routing / smaller boxes?

hi,

On Wed, Feb 06, 2002 at 04:07:19PM +0100, Jan Gunnik Hope wrote:
> We have MPLS VPN (vrf routing) and .1q routing in
> production on 3640 platform.
> In Feature Navigator, you want to look for :
> MPLS Virtual Private Networks (VPN)

Which IOS version do you use?

gert

-- 
USENET is *not* the non-clickable part of WWW!
 
//www.muc.de/~gert/
Gert Doering - Munich, Germany
gert@greenie.muc.de
fax: +49-89-35655025
gert.doering@physik.tu-muenchen.de

------------------------------------------------------------------------ ------- This verifies that this e-mail has been scanned for virus and deemed virus-free according to F-secure Content Scanner 5.0 Wed, 6 Feb 2002 16:59:52 +0100 GMT ------------------------------------------------------------------------ -------



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun Aug 04 2002 - 04:13:31 EDT