Re: Subnet Mask

From: Gert Doering (gert@greenie.muc.de)
Date: Thu Mar 28 2002 - 03:07:11 EST

Next message: Barry Raveendran Greene: "RE: [nsp] icmp blocking"
Previous message: Gert Doering: "Re: [nsp] icmp blocking"
In reply to: Giuliano Cardozo Medalha: "Subnet Mask"
Next in thread: Stephen Sprunk: "Re: Subnet Mask"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

Hi,

On Wed, Mar 27, 2002 at 09:34:50PM -0300, Giuliano Cardozo Medalha wrote:
> If it analyse all the masks of all gateways, the processor will blow down ?
>
> If it uses the standart mask (A, B or C class) it will not route for
> subneted address non-standat (like 255.255.255.128) !!!

Be assured that Cisco boxes do know how to route IP in a classless/VLSM
environment.

gert

-- 
USENET is *not* the non-clickable part of WWW!
                                                           //www.muc.de/~gert/
Gert Doering - Munich, Germany                             gert@greenie.muc.de
fax: +49-89-35655025                        gert.doering@physik.tu-muenchen.de

Next message: Barry Raveendran Greene: "RE: [nsp] icmp blocking"
Previous message: Gert Doering: "Re: [nsp] icmp blocking"
In reply to: Giuliano Cardozo Medalha: "Subnet Mask"
Next in thread: Stephen Sprunk: "Re: Subnet Mask"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun Aug 04 2002 - 04:13:38 EDT