RE: [nsp] Cisco vs. Juniper of LSP setup

From: Martin, Christian (cmartin@gnilink.net)
Date: Fri Apr 12 2002 - 13:20:01 EDT


The verbatim command is not supported on all platforms. C10k is one for
sure!

chris

>-----Original Message-----
>From: Sean Crocker [mailto:crockers@mail.trinicom.com]
>Sent: Friday, April 12, 2002 12:31 PM
>To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net; LU
>Cc: juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
>Subject: Re: [nsp] Cisco vs. Juniper of LSP setup
>
>
>There's nothing like Juniper's no-cspf.
>
>There is a way that is hidden/undocumented/unsupported. Unless IOS
>has changed since last I looked, you have to define an explicit path,
>then append "verbatim" to the path-option statement...
>
>R1(config-if)#tunnel mpls traffic-eng path-option 1 explicit
>name foo verbatim
>
>The explicit-path can be as short as just one node (the directly-
>connected next-hop). The next node (either cisco and juniper)
>will strip out the PATH's ERO and send it on towards egress
>according to the RIB, so from that point on it's like no-cspf.
>
>Sean
>
>
>>I just noticed that in cisco you can not establish LSP
>>without enabling OSPF
>>opaque LSA, this is quite different from Juniper.
>>JUNOS allows you to set up
>>LSP just based on normal IGP information. Am I missing
>>some commands in IOS?
>>Does IOS have a way to enable MPLS-TE without having
>>OSPF opaque LSA?
>>
>>Thanks
>>LU
>>
>>__________________________________________________
>>Do You Yahoo!?
>>Yahoo! Tax Center - online filing with TurboTax
http://taxes.yahoo.com/
>
>



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun Aug 04 2002 - 04:13:40 EDT