Hi,
In mail.net.cisco.nsp, you wrote:
> any of you have wide implementation of CLNS? need your advice!
Yes.
> over GRE TUNNEL! WHAT'S THE IMPLICATION OF THIS SOLUTION? IS IT RIGHT
> TO USE TUNNEL TO TRANSPORT CLNS? OR ships-in-the-night approach is
> much more reliable than tunnel? co'z i can't imagine how many tunnel
> we will going to create the network. ANY KNOWN SOLUTION?
CLNS in GRE-tunnels work fine, never had any problems with them. This is
usually even recommended since you need to keep you L1/L2 areas whole
inside your OSI management network (assuming that's what you're doing.)
// kaj
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun Aug 04 2002 - 04:13:43 EDT