RE: [nsp] IOS ver 6.2 PIX

From: Rubens Kuhl Jr. (rkuhljr@uol.com.br)
Date: Fri May 17 2002 - 10:08:19 EDT


May be they started using compression, changed compression method...

Rubens Kuhl Jr.

-----Original Message-----
From: Zhang, Anchi [mailto:AZhang@reliant.com]
Sent: Friday, May 17, 2002 10:20 AM
To: Roberto Paoletti; cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Subject: RE: [nsp] IOS ver 6.2 PIX

Cisco may have sent its PIX developers to efficient programming training
school.

log2% ls -l pix*
-rwxrwxrwx 1 root other 2156544 Aug 27 2001 pix526.bin
-rwxrwxrwx 1 root other 2174976 Jan 4 15:57 pix532.bin
-rwxrwxrwx 1 root other 2562048 Oct 16 2001 pix611.bin
-rwxrwxrwx 1 root other 2580480 Mar 20 09:39 pix612.bin
-rwxrwxrwx 1 root other 1640448 Apr 22 08:52 pix621.bin

Anchi

-----Original Message-----
From: Roberto Paoletti [mailto:roberto.paoletti@mail.wind.it]
Sent: Friday, May 17, 2002 6:43 AM
To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Subject: [nsp] IOS ver 6.2 PIX

Hi guys ,
                i'm upgrading IOS Pix from ver 6.1 at 6.2 and the first
thing i see that the new IOS is more less than ver 6.1.
Why ?
And is there different for failover link in gigabic from failover link
in fast ethernet ?

Thanks for your response.

Roberto Paoletti
Operations Server Farm & Networking
Network Security & AAA
------------------------------------------------------------------
Wind Telecomunicazioni S.p.A. - www.wind.it
Internet & Multimedia - Fixed Portal
via Lorenteggio, 257
20152 Milano
Tel: +39-02-3011 4166
Cell:+39-3294206077
E-mail:roberto.paoletti@mail.wind.it



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun Aug 04 2002 - 04:13:44 EDT