Can anyone tell what these errors mean and what should i do to correct if
something is broken:
|Critical|Local1.Critical|10.0.0.2|UDP|110608: Jun 13 18:17:22.303 GMT:
%SYS-2-GETBUF: Bad getbuffer, bytes= 62816
|Critical|Local1.Critical|10.0.0.2|UDP|110609: -Process= "DHCPD Receive",
ipl= 0, pid= 47
|Critical|Local1.Critical|10.0.0.2|UDP|110610: -Traceback= 6029E1F0 60372AA0
603727CC 60371850 60371B78 603C59D0 603C5E90 603BBF54 603BC2E0 603BC420
602D0724 602D0710
thanks,
PKM
-----Original Message-----
From: Iwan Thomas [mailto:iwan@uk.cw.net]
Sent: Friday, June 14, 2002 6:38 AM
To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Subject: RE: [nsp] CCIE certification track?
thanks for all the feedback. The general consensus seems to be that r&s is
the most generic and 'useful', although security has its' advocates.
Security does touch on MPLS VPNs, but interestingly it's the only one of the
three that does.
It does of course depend on what one's experience and role are....
Off to think ;-)
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Iwan Thomas [mailto:iwan@uk.cw.net]
> Sent: Thursday, June 13, 2002 12:47 PM
> To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
> Subject: [nsp] CCIE certification track?
>
>
> Hi,
>
> General query; I'm a CCNP looking to progress to CCIE in the
> next 18 months.
> Of the three certification tracks (security, routing/switching,
> communications), which is currently favoured in the market
> place, and which
> is most pertinent to emerging technologies?
>
> I'm fortunate to be in a position to test and train on any of
> the three, so
> that's not an issue. Any advice / personal experience would
> be most welcome.
>
> Rgds,
>
> Iwan Thomas
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun Aug 04 2002 - 04:13:47 EDT