Re: [nsp] To S or not to S?

• Next message: McMaster, Jay: "RE: [nsp] To S or not to S?"
• Previous message: Eric Osborne: "Re: [nsp] To S or not to S?"
• In reply to: Gert Doering: "Re: [nsp] To S or not to S?"
• Next in thread: Charles Sprickman: "[nsp] To S or not to S?"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
• Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

On Tue, Jul 02, 2002 at 11:59:30PM +0200, Gert Doering wrote:
>
> Well - 12.0S is very good. Haven't had any exposure to 12.2S (is it
> publically available already?) so I can't comment on that.
---end quoted text---

<rant on>

I would say that 12.0S *used to be* very good. Around 12.0(17)S/S1. Haven't
seen a worthy release since then. :( (I'm talking 12K, 7500 and 7200 here).
Maybe its just our luck, but nonetheless.

<rant off>

SY,

-- 
 CCNP, CCDP (R&S)                          Dmitri E. Kalintsev
 CDPlayer@irc               Network Architect @ connect.com.au
 dek @ connect.com.au    phone: +61 3 9674 3913 fax: 9251 3666
 http://-UNAVAIL-         UIN:7150410    cell: +61 414 821 382

• Next message: McMaster, Jay: "RE: [nsp] To S or not to S?"
• Previous message: Eric Osborne: "Re: [nsp] To S or not to S?"
• In reply to: Gert Doering: "Re: [nsp] To S or not to S?"
• Next in thread: Charles Sprickman: "[nsp] To S or not to S?"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
• Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun Aug 04 2002 - 04:13:48 EDT