On Tue, 4 Jan 2000, Everett Dowd wrote:
> Using the interface specific address, or network statement is a large
> matter for debate. Last I heard Cisco recommends the network rather than
> the interface for the network statement.. I have seen this actually make
> networks break, especially if the network has been designed in a network
> fashion.... Both designs work equally well, and I don't feel that you
> have any finer grain of control using one method or another... The
> biggest point is to be consistent with your network statements. What does
Well, changing the network mask to 0.0.0.0 didn't help either.
> What I would suggest is to take the OSPF statement out and re-enter it...
> I have had some strange problems with OSPF and this usually seems to take
> care of it.
>
TA DA! This did it!! Funny thing is, this same problem cropped up on two
routers on the other part of the ring. Oh well, chalk one up to
experience. Cisco bug perhaps? Thanks to everyone who replied! :)
Eric Merkel / MetaLink Technologies, Inc
~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*
Email: merkel@metalink.net
Phone: 419-782-3472 X304
~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun Aug 04 2002 - 04:12:08 EDT