Re: Punching a hole in policy routing

From: Alfredo Sola (alfredo@intelideas.com)
Date: Fri Jan 07 2000 - 05:03:28 EST

Next message: Tatsuya Kawasaki: "[nsp] urgnet .."
Previous message: Neil J. McRae: "Re: POS problems"
In reply to: Earl Smith: "Punching a hole in policy routing"
Next in thread: Earl Smith: "Re: Punching a hole in policy routing"
Reply: Earl Smith: "Re: Punching a hole in policy routing"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

> I have a 2620 that has two T1s connected to two different
> providers in preparation for multihoming (no, I don't intend to
> take full views). Provider A routes me a /23. Provider B routes
> me a /24. The 2620 has 2 WICs and 1 Ethernet.

Not a straight answer, but you will probably find this useful:

http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/cc/cisco/mkt/ios/nat/tech/emios_wp.htm

--
Alfredo Sola
Administrador del sistema

Next message: Tatsuya Kawasaki: "[nsp] urgnet .."
Previous message: Neil J. McRae: "Re: POS problems"
In reply to: Earl Smith: "Punching a hole in policy routing"
Next in thread: Earl Smith: "Re: Punching a hole in policy routing"
Reply: Earl Smith: "Re: Punching a hole in policy routing"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun Aug 04 2002 - 04:12:08 EDT