Re: policy routing performance

• Next message: Russell Briggs: "Re: [nsp] HSRP TCP socket?"
• Previous message: Rafi Sadowsky: "Re: [nsp] HSRP TCP socket?"
• In reply to: Hank Nussbacher: "Re: policy routing performance"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
• Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

        (Or I could buy some GSR's, right? :)

        After a bit, I realized I wanted to policy route based on
the *destination* address. (And the crowd says....) "Why not just
use normal routing mechanisms?"

        But this is still useful information because I'm planning
on using policy routing for path decision based on source address
in another application.

--
On Wed, Jan 12, 2000 at 05:27:41PM +0200, Hank Nussbacher said:
> At 21:41 11/01/00 +0200, Oded Comay wrote:
> 
> Of course if you use RSP8s which are rated at twice the speed of RSP4s
> (600Kpps vs 300Kpps for CEFed routing) with VIP4s which are rated at about
> 80% faster than VIP2-50s (200Kpps vs 100Kpps) you may be able to get more
> thruput :-)
> 
> -Hank

• Next message: Russell Briggs: "Re: [nsp] HSRP TCP socket?"
• Previous message: Rafi Sadowsky: "Re: [nsp] HSRP TCP socket?"
• In reply to: Hank Nussbacher: "Re: policy routing performance"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
• Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun Aug 04 2002 - 04:12:09 EDT