Re: [nsp] CEF stability

From: Neil J. McRae (neil@COLT.NET)
Date: Wed Jan 26 2000 - 08:51:52 EST

Next message: Hank Nussbacher: "[nsp] CAR bug"
Previous message: Rafi Sadowsky: "RE: [nsp] CEF stability"
In reply to: Rafi Sadowsky: "RE: [nsp] CEF stability"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

On Wed, 26 Jan 2000 15:47:41 +0200 (IST)
Rafi Sadowsky <rafi@meron.openu.ac.il> wrote:

> so what's the point of setting the sub-int at a larger MTU then the
> main-interface ?
> better make it "right" from the start if you need a reload to activate it ...

We ran into the problem post production.

--
Neil J. McRae                             C O L T  I N T E R N E T
neil@COLT.NET

Next message: Hank Nussbacher: "[nsp] CAR bug"
Previous message: Rafi Sadowsky: "RE: [nsp] CEF stability"
In reply to: Rafi Sadowsky: "RE: [nsp] CEF stability"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun Aug 04 2002 - 04:12:09 EDT