Re: Fwd: Re: [nsp] Best ATM termination options for DSL on 7200

From: George Manuelian (gmanueli@cisco.com)
Date: Tue Feb 15 2000 - 13:02:51 EST


Best ATM termination poptions for DSL

We are focusing our efforts to target DSL market with 6400 and 7200.
We are adding all the necessary features (PPPoA, PPPoE,PPPoA SVC, RBE ...) to the 7200 series
to match the feature set of the 6400. We are even looking to create special DSL bundles for this market (any sugestions ?).
Due to fix processor and WAN interfaces, 7100 is really targeted for the VPN space and will not be able to participate in future enhancements to 7200 series that are necessary for the DSL market.

New processors (NSE-1 ..) are coming out for the 7200 that will vastly improve service aggregation performance and scalability.

Please contact me directly for futher road-map information on 7200 DSL features.

George Manuelian
7200 Product Manager

At 09:45 AM 2/15/00 -0800, Rob Haragan wrote:
>More 7100 in the xDSL aggregation space from the customers this time.
>
>Rob
>
>>Resent-Date: Tue, 15 Feb 2000 04:20:10 -0500
>>Date: Tue, 15 Feb 2000 04:05:31 -0500 (EST)
>>From: George Robbins <grr@shandakor.tharsis.com>
>>To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net, Kent@acceleration.net
>>Subject: Re: [nsp] Best ATM termination options for DSL on 7200
>>Resent-From: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
>>X-Mailing-List: <cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net> archive/latest/2192
>>X-Loop: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
>>Resent-Sender: cisco-nsp-request@puck.nether.net
>>
>>> From: "Kent Tambling" <Kent@acceleration.net>
>>> To: <cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net>
>>> Date: Mon, 14 Feb 2000 20:43:55 -0500
>>> Subject: [nsp] Best ATM termination options for DSL on 7200
>>>
>>> PA-A3 for T3 termination from BellSouth for the purpose of ADSL PVC's?
>>>
>>> What hardware combo do you folks suggest for terminating BellSouth's
>>> Industrial DSL? Any smart options required? What if we just want a
>>> single T1 ATM delivered? (bridge multiples maybe) Whats the best =
>>> option?
>>
>>I don't know the characteristics of the "Industrial DSL", but in
>>general a PA-A3 is a workable solution for getting started when
>>you don't want to get a dedicated DSL router.
>>
>>Typically DSL requries no fancy ATM options, in fact it often doesn't
>>use some that would be useful like LMI for finding PVC's or verifying
>>PVC up/down state. From what I've seen you can also use a PA-A1 or
>>or the PA-CES card if you have then lyaing around or even a HSSI and
>>ADSU, although each of these options will provide a more restrictions
>>on the number of PVC's that you can support.
>>
>>You should however, check with the provider for compabiltiy issues
>>so you don't get tripped up on which version of UNI is *really*
>>required or PVC number schemes.
>>
>>Other options at the T3 level are the 7100 series routers, the 6400
>>ATM-switch/routers and of course our old buddies Redback & co, though
>>it's when you get into the consumer/residential DSL that you really
>>need the features that these support.
>>
>>We have serveral PA-A3's deployed for DSL - it's worked out reasonably
>>well - DSL rollout can be really slow, especially if your providers
>>are get getting into the CO's and it can take a long time before you
>>hit the limitations...
>>
>> George
>>
>>
>

____________________________________________________________________

George Gino Manuelian
Product Manager 7200 Series
Cisco Systems
Enterprise Line of Business
                        

170 West Tasman Drive
San Jose, Ca, 95134
San Jose Phone: 408.527.7237 pager: 1-800-365-4578
gmanueli@cisco.com
____________________________________________________________________



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun Aug 04 2002 - 04:12:10 EDT