sorry ahead of time for spamming the list..
but i need an answer to this question and none of my cohorts seem to have one.
i have a route to null 0
i.e. ip route xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx 255.255.255.248 null0
this address is part of a nat pool. i do a show ip route for xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx it
it shows that it is directly connected to null0, but it also appears in the nat
translation table. could
the nat table be overriding the route to the null interface.
signed,
a bit confused.
George Robbins wrote:
> Cisco uses a lot of extra MAC addresses for switch ports and vlans
> and the like. You might want to check that if you've got a lot of
> mystery mac floating around your system.
>
> George
>
> > From cisco-nsp-request@puck.nether.net Tue Jun 20 00:31:30 2000
> > Resent-Date: Tue, 20 Jun 2000 00:33:32 -0400
> > Received-Date: Tue, 20 Jun 2000 00:28:47 -0400
> > Date: Tue, 20 Jun 2000 00:28:45 -0400 (EDT)
> > From: Charles Sprickman <spork@inch.com>
> > To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
> > Subject: [nsp] Ethernet Manufacturer Codes
> > Resent-From: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
> > X-Mailing-List: <cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net> archive/latest/3159
> > X-Loop: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
> > Precedence: list
> > Resent-Sender: cisco-nsp-request@puck.nether.net
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > I'm sorry that this is a bit off-topic, but I'm hoping someone here has
> > some information. I have about a dozen sites bookmarked that list
> > manufacturer's codes, but I have two I am unable to track down. From what
> > I understand the preferred reference is:
> >
> > http://www.cavebear.com/CaveBear/Ethernet/vendor.html
> >
> > The two codes I'm trying to track down are:
> >
> > 00a0.c5e0
> >
> > and
> >
> > 0050.da6e
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > Charles
> >
> > | Charles Sprickman | Internet Channel
> > | INCH System Administration Team | (212)243-5200
> > | spork@inch.com | access@inch.com
> >
> >
> >
> >
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun Aug 04 2002 - 04:12:13 EDT