Re: [nsp] 12.1(2)T

• Next message: Scott Morris: "RE: [nsp] 12.1(2)T"
• Previous message: Paul Jacobs: "[nsp] 12.1(2)T"
• In reply to: Paul Jacobs: "[nsp] 12.1(2)T"
• Next in thread: Scott Morris: "RE: [nsp] 12.1(2)T"
• Reply: Scott Morris: "RE: [nsp] 12.1(2)T"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
• Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

On Thu, Jun 22, 2000 at 06:08:45PM -0400, Paul Jacobs wrote:
> Is anyone running 12.1(2)T (LD) on a 2621 or a 3640 with FE ?
>
> How does it run?
>
> How is the security?, as stable as 12.0.7(T) ?

Any particular reason for going for 12.1(x)T train ?

12.1 mainline is the direct successor of the 12.0(x)T train, we have
good experiences with 12.1 on 36xx, 72xx and 75xx

/Jesper

-- 
Jesper Skriver, jesper(at)skriver(dot)dk  -  CCIE #5456
Private: Geek            @ AS2109 
One Unix to rule them all, One Resolver to find them,
One IP to bring them all and in the zone to bind them.

• Next message: Scott Morris: "RE: [nsp] 12.1(2)T"
• Previous message: Paul Jacobs: "[nsp] 12.1(2)T"
• In reply to: Paul Jacobs: "[nsp] 12.1(2)T"
• Next in thread: Scott Morris: "RE: [nsp] 12.1(2)T"
• Reply: Scott Morris: "RE: [nsp] 12.1(2)T"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
• Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun Aug 04 2002 - 04:12:13 EDT