Re: [nsp] BGP dampening question

From: Pete Templin (templin@urdirect.net)
Date: Fri Aug 11 2000 - 10:17:17 EDT

Next message: Asbjorn Hojmark: "RE: [nsp] Cat 2948G-L3 code?"
Previous message: Jesper Skriver: "Re: [nsp] Traffic shaping on 2948G-L3?"
In reply to: Pete Templin: "[nsp] BGP dampening question"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

I'm going to follow up to my own post.

On Fri, 21 Jul 2000, Pete Templin wrote:

[snip]

> In a nutshell, suppress-value on 192.168.51.0/24 (my home lan) is 3000.
> Half-life is 30, reuse-value is 750, max-suppress-time is 60. For some
> reason, "penalty" never exceeds 3000 on the flapping prefix, so I never
> see it get suppressed:

As it turns out, there's (possibly) a small change that needs to happen to
RIPE-210. My "back of an envelope" thinking is that

2x(max-suppress/half-life) must be greater than (suppress/reuse)

which isn't what RIPE-210 outlines, for /24 and longer.

Pete

-- Peter J. Templin, Jr., CCNA, CCDA VP Networking

On-Line Internet Services - URDirect.net A division of Global On-Line Computers 5606 Randolph Blvd templin@urdirect.net San Antonio, TX 78233 (210)692-9911

Next message: Asbjorn Hojmark: "RE: [nsp] Cat 2948G-L3 code?"
Previous message: Jesper Skriver: "Re: [nsp] Traffic shaping on 2948G-L3?"
In reply to: Pete Templin: "[nsp] BGP dampening question"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun Aug 04 2002 - 04:12:14 EDT