Re: [nsp] 12.0(12)S: Any feedback from the field...

From: Robert E. Seastrom (
Date: Thu Sep 07 2000 - 11:49:43 EDT

Mark Prior <> writes:

> Has anyone on this list had luck (good or bad) with 12.0(12)S? I
> know about the dCEF bug, what else is broke in it?
> Bad on a 7500, 12.0(11)S is a safer bet. Seems OK on a 7200 though.

another data point: i have 7 weeks plus of uptime on a
7505/rsp4-256/dcef (all vip2-40 with 64mb each), ip and appletalk with
12.0(10.6)S2, "j" load. haven't had any dcef problems, but on the
other hand, at peak i'm only running about 100 mbit/sec total through
the box, so it's not like it's loaded heavily.


This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun Aug 04 2002 - 04:12:16 EDT