Hi All,
Thanks !
Yes, at this moment I think we were discussing scenarios where multihoming
with BGP was not possible due to hardware contraints.
So, I understood that this scenario is possible, but not the best. The
second step is upgrade the router to have at least partial routes and better
routing decisions.
Regards,
Jose
-----Original Message-----
From: Jose Ferreira [mailto:jose.ferreira@intelig.net.br]
Sent: sexta-feira, 13 de outubro de 2000 12:15
To: 'cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net'
Subject: [nsp] Multi-Homing without BGP
Importance: High
Hi,
I would like to know if a default routing for multiple providers works as a
basic solution for Multi-Homing.
The customer has a low-end router and the step 1 would be add default routes
in the way to both increase outbound bandwidth to the Internet and
redundancy that multi-homing provides.
The configuration would be something like:
ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 @provider1
ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 @provider2
int s0
ip route-cache
int s1
ip route-cache
Having two default routes with equal metric, both routes will be installed
in the Cisco´s IP routing table and the load balancing would be done on a
per-connection basis.
Is this the right way to do that ?
I would like to know about your experience with this kind of solution.
Best Regards,
José Ricardo Bastos Ferreira
jose.ferreira@intelig.net.br
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun Aug 04 2002 - 04:12:18 EDT