Why not just use traffic-shape? That simulates a nice full pipe and is
TCP-friendly.
On Mon, 4 Dec 2000, Chris Roberts wrote:
> On flows of this size, I can see CAR producing better results. However
> since it does no smoothing of flows, it produces nasty TCP performance,
> as when customers burst, they will find their TCP sessions exceed their
> excess burst and drop packets, causing TCP to go into slow restart.
> In our applications (2meg LL shaped to 1meg and such) this is
> not so useful. We have also evaluated, and are using the Packeteer,
> which is I guess what you meant?
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun Aug 04 2002 - 04:12:22 EDT