no worries. i don't know why the examples on CCO may have included
cisco av-pairs unless it was for some special IOS feature. i agree that
our documentation can be bad at times :( but we do try to clean it up.
if there's some specific examples you would like fixed, clarified, please
let me know off-line, and i will try to direct the feedback to the appropriate
interested parties.
regards
.siva
>
>
> > yes you can have both bridging and PPPoE enabled on the same interface.
> > i.e. do IRB or RBE with PPPoE. i have worked with a large service
> > provider in the past that offers this model of termination. there isn't
> > anything different for writing radius profiles for PPPoE, compared to
> > PPPoA or dialup PPP. i think i might be missing something here????
>
> Probably just me showing off my ignorance. I wasn't really thinking
> there was a difference between radius profiles for pppoe vs dialup-
> my problem is finding the descriptions of the radius profiles for
> either one. Your example includes:
>
> >
> > #sample radius profile
> > service-type = framed
> > framed-protocol = ppp
> > framed-ip-address = 192.168.54.100
> > framed-route = 192.168.54.0/24
> > # set's users ip address to 192.168.54.100 and installs a route
> > # for 192.168.54.0/24 pointing to the remote 192.168.54.100
>
> That looks like a very normal RADIUS profile e.g. that we'd use on
> other RAS equipment. My confusion, I suppose, stems from the fact that
> when I have found example RADIUS profiles for use with Cisco's pppoe,
> they have not been that straightforward. Rather, they have included
> things like:
>
> cisco-avpair = "some magic stuff here",
> cisco-avpair = "some other magic stuff here"
>
> and I have struggled in vain to find a description of the magic. If
> the example that you gave above will work (with appropriate syntax
> cleanups), and I can forget about those magic strings, then so much
> the better. (I certainly have never encountered any cisco
> documentation that illustrates a reasonable looking profile like the
> one in your example... again, that's probably my fault, though I've
> certainly looked long and hard.)
>
> Thanks,
> -mm-
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun Aug 04 2002 - 04:12:23 EDT