Michael,
cisco never designed to handle 2 T1 with cisco 2500.
It meant to have a backup FR or some slow connection...
If you run full 2 T1, you will see a lot of underruns errors..
Have you tried with 2600? what sort of CPU does 2600 have?
Tatsuya
/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/
Tatsuya Kawasaki
Allegiance Telecom
Unlock the Power of the Internet
http://www.kivex.com
Phone 301.215.6777 Fax 301.215.5991
Affiliation given for identification not representation
/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/
On Tue, 9 Jan 2001, Michael K. Smith wrote:
> The 2600 can handle two t-1's with no trouble at all. In fact, I don't
> see why the 2500 couldn't, provided other processes were taking up minimal
> cpu usage.
>
> Mike
>
> On Tue, 9 Jan 2001, Tatsuya Kawasaki wrote:
>
> > hello...
> >
> > I know cisco 2500 can physically handle 2 T1 but techincally
> > it can not. Do you know whether 2600 can or not?
> > which low end cisco router can handle 2 T1s?
> >
> >
> > Tatsuya
> >
> >
> > /_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/
> > Tatsuya Kawasaki
> > Allegiance Telecom
> > Unlock the Power of the Internet
> > http://www.kivex.com
> > Phone 301.215.6777 Fax 301.215.5991
> > Affiliation given for identification not representation
> > /_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/
> >
> >
>
> -------------------------------------------------------------------
> Michael K. Smith mike@wackypackets.com
>
> "I can no longer sit back and allow Communist infiltration,
> Communist indoctrination, Communist subvsersion and the
> International Communist Conspiracy to sap and impurify all
> of our precious bodily fluids." -- Jack D. Ripper
>
> PGP Key: 92F3 3C34 34A2 6900 8F9C 9A35 6D2A D0A6 4846 3BE0
> -------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun Aug 04 2002 - 04:12:25 EDT