Andrew wrote:
>
> Of course a 2500 can handle 2 T-1's. A Cisco with two or more highspeed
> serial interfaces can handle multiple T-1's. 2 in a physical configuration
> and (reasonably) 4 via an inverse muxed configuration. Disclaimer: IMUXing
> is stinky IMHO ;)
>
> At 01:49 PM 1/9/01 -0500, Tatsuya Kawasaki wrote:
> >hello...
> >
> >I know cisco 2500 can physically handle 2 T1 but techincally
> >it can not. Do you know whether 2600 can or not?
> >which low end cisco router can handle 2 T1s?
> >
> >
> >Tatsuya
> >
> >
> >/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/
> >Tatsuya Kawasaki
> >Allegiance Telecom
> >Unlock the Power of the Internet
> >http://www.kivex.com
> >Phone 301.215.6777 Fax 301.215.5991
> >Affiliation given for identification not representation
> >/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/
what is your particular disdain for i-muxing. rsvp and i'll see
if we have any of the same issues as we do a bit i-muxing and
the only real problem is knowing how to judge the symmetry on both
ends of the link...the real bugger is when the T's are provisioned
from diff providers..but it's sill manageable.
piranha.
--------------------------------------------------
My Lord Tzu, running away is the first martial tao
Sifu Yuen - archery master to Sun Tzu
---------------------------------------------------
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun Aug 04 2002 - 04:12:25 EDT