This is true. I have had many 2500's running busy T-1's w/o incident
(provided they were not doing loads of process switching.) The biggest
killer, that I have experienced, were sloppy ACL's and poor queuing strategy.
-A
At 02:07 PM 1/9/01 -0500, Michael K. Smith wrote:
>The 2600 can handle two t-1's with no trouble at all. In fact, I don't
>see why the 2500 couldn't, provided other processes were taking up minimal
>cpu usage.
>
>Mike
>
>On Tue, 9 Jan 2001, Tatsuya Kawasaki wrote:
>
> > hello...
> >
> > I know cisco 2500 can physically handle 2 T1 but techincally
> > it can not. Do you know whether 2600 can or not?
> > which low end cisco router can handle 2 T1s?
> >
> >
> > Tatsuya
> >
> >
> > /_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/
> > Tatsuya Kawasaki
> > Allegiance Telecom
> > Unlock the Power of the Internet
> > http://www.kivex.com
> > Phone 301.215.6777 Fax 301.215.5991
> > Affiliation given for identification not representation
> > /_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/
> >
> >
>
>-------------------------------------------------------------------
>Michael K. Smith mike@wackypackets.com
>
>"I can no longer sit back and allow Communist infiltration,
>Communist indoctrination, Communist subvsersion and the
>International Communist Conspiracy to sap and impurify all
>of our precious bodily fluids." -- Jack D. Ripper
>
>PGP Key: 92F3 3C34 34A2 6900 8F9C 9A35 6D2A D0A6 4846 3BE0
>-------------------------------------------------------------------
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun Aug 04 2002 - 04:12:25 EDT