Well the other issue you'll have to deal with is that the guys
sitting on the /24 will either static routes in each box,
the gateway proxy-arping for the /28 or bridging - some way
to get from "one the wire" to "via the gateway"...
> From: Ray Davis <ray@carpe.net>
> To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
> Subject: Re: [nsp] vpn+nat stumped
> Date: Wed, 24 Jan 2001 10:58:12 +0100
> Sender: ray@carpe.net
>
> > > === The config of "remote-dialup" ...
> >
> > This router doesn't seem to have a route for 192.168.9.240/28 pointing to
> > the remote router?
>
> (Sorry - the second config is supposed to be called "vpn-gateway".)
>
> But should I route it to? The vpn peer 123.123.140.1 is not directly
> connected and there isn't a tun0 or something associated with the
> vpn "tunnel".
>
> Thanks,
> Ray
>
> > > ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 123.123.123.101
> > > ip route 10.0.0.0 255.0.0.0 192.168.9.1
> > > ip route 192.168.0.0 255.255.0.0 192.168.9.1
> >
> > --
> > Rodney van den Oever / +31 6 29554534 / KeyID 0x0A6CCE53
> > 'OIR - On Insertion Reload'
> >
> >
>
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun Aug 04 2002 - 04:12:26 EDT