RE: [nsp] ip spoofing prevention

From: K.Nathan Casassa (nathan@arteck.com)
Date: Fri Feb 09 2001 - 08:44:55 EST


Yes - uRPF can be option with multihomed connections as long as both return
paths have an equal cost.

Nate

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Thomas Kernen [mailto:tkernen@deckpoint.ch]
> Sent: Friday, February 09, 2001 7:28 AM
> To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
> Subject: Re: [nsp] ip spoofing prevention
>
>
>
> All,
> A quick note the mention that uRPF Enhancements have been
> mentioned multiple
> times on this
> list over the last few months. I'm surprised that people that follow this
> mailing list and post to it
> on a regular basis don't keep up with the news and need to be
> "reminded" of
> features that have
> been discussed a few weeks earlier.
>
> Thomas
> (my morning rant, ip route x.x.x.x null0)
>



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun Aug 04 2002 - 04:12:28 EDT