4 or 8MB of SRAM
----------------
I think you can do Distributed Multi-Link PPP on a 7500 and support up to 16
T1s (8 on a VIP2-40, and 16 on a VIP2-50 with 4+MB of RAM)
n
-----Original Message-----
From: Phil Bedard [mailto:philb@cyberlynk.net]
Sent: Tuesday, February 13, 2001 12:25 PM
To: Martin Picard
Cc: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [nsp] Multiple T1s versus MLPPP
The router won't balance more than 6 parallel paths I believe, so
the only real option is MPPP. I tested this a few weeks ago when we had
a customer situation come up that might warrant doing this. I could
only test 6 parallel paths vs. a 6 circuit MPPP bundle. In my tests, it
showed the 6 load-balanced T1s to be about 4-5% faster than the MPPP
bundle. The 8 T1 MPPP bundle was definitely faster than the 6
load-balanced T1s however. These tests were done on two 7206VXRs
(NPE300) with PA-MC-8T1s connected back to back. The CPU usage
difference between MPPP and load-balanced was perhaps 1-2%.
I'm pretty sure the max you can do is 8 in one bundle, but don't quote
me on that. I believe on the 10000 you can do 10 in a single bundle,
but I doubt you are using a 10000.
Phil Bedard
On Tue, 13 Feb 2001, Martin Picard wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I have two routers with 8-T1 interfaces.
> How much benefit do I have by using MLPPP
> to bundle them instead of using separate
> serial interfaces ?
> Also, what would be the max number of
> T1s to put in such MLPPP bundle ?
>
> tx
> mp
>
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun Aug 04 2002 - 04:12:29 EDT