Re: [nsp] RSP8 and SLLOOOWWW 'wr mem' performance

From: Siva Valliappan (svalliap@cisco.com)
Date: Tue Mar 13 2001 - 20:38:02 EST


both the below bugs have been fixed. :) but there may be some new issue
you are running into if the below bug fixes doesn't cover the particular
problem listed below, in which case i would suggest opening a case with
the TAC so that we can investigate to see what the expected duration should
be for the config and so forth.

.siva

>
> Is there a fix?
> DS
> On Tue, 13 Mar 2001, Siva Valliappan wrote:
>
> > it does write to NVRAM a bit slower because there's 2 megs of NVRAM :),
> > but there is a bug out there - the bug id is CSCdr53369.
> > there is an older bug with slow nvram commands - CSCdm03148.
> >
> > cheers
> > .siva
> >
> > >
> > > I was wrong, no bug here - RSP8 does write nvram slower than RSP4.
> > > Sorry.
> > > Mike
> > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > From: "Martin, Christian" <cmartin@gnilink.net>
> > > To: "'Danny Sutantyo'" <dsutanty@dsutanty-wkst.sc.intel.com>; "Martin,
> > > Christian" <cmartin@gnilink.net>
> > > Cc: <cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net>
> > > Sent: Tuesday, March 13, 2001 3:30 PM
> > > Subject: RE: [nsp] RSP8 and SLLOOOWWW 'wr mem' performance
> > >
> > >
> > > >
> > > > Danny,
> > > >
> > > > It is an RSP8 - which only goes in a 7500... ;)
> > > >
> > > > As far as RSP4 performance, 1000 line configs save in 2-4 secs. RSP8 in
> > > > 20-30, 100 lines.
> > > >
> > > > I cannot find a DDTS on this. Anyone have it?
> > > >
> > > > thx,
> > > > chris
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > From: Danny Sutantyo [mailto:dsutanty@dsutanty-wkst.sc.intel.com]
> > > > Sent: Tuesday, March 13, 2001 6:27 PM
> > > > To: Martin, Christian
> > > > Cc: 'cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net'
> > > > Subject: Re: [nsp] RSP8 and SLLOOOWWW 'wr mem' performance
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > I think depends on the router you are using, routers like 7500, it's slow
> > > > to write mem...
> > > > DS
> > > > On Tue, 13 Mar 2001, Martin, Christian wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Folks,
> > > > >
> > > > > Has anyone seen a significant increase in NVRAM access time over RSP4
> > > when
> > > > > writing a config to it? I am seeing a 100 line config take 20-30
> > > seconds
> > > > to
> > > > > save, and with HSA, about 45-60 seconds total.
> > > > >
> > > > > Any ideas? I know it's a larger NVRAM - maybe this is it?
> > > > >
> > > > > Running 12.0(11)S3
> > > > >
> > > > > thx,
> > > > > ./chris
> > > > >
> > >
> >
>



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun Aug 04 2002 - 04:12:32 EDT