Re: [nsp] a question on LATE COLLISION

From: Brian (bri@sonicboom.org)
Date: Thu Mar 15 2001 - 13:48:15 EST


Uh at 280 feet, you are close to exceeding the max distance for a cat 5
run, I wonder if the cat 3 max is shorter. Cat 5 max is 100 meters I
believe.

        Bri

On Thu, 15 Mar 2001, Tatsuya Kawasaki wrote:

>
> Hi Guys,
>
> I have a question.
>
> One of our Building is getting a lot of late collision.
>
> well there is a scoop.
> say this building has followind devices
> A x.x.x.2
> B x.x.x.3
> C x.x.x.4
> G x.x.x.1
>
> C is a quite bit far way from others.
> close to 280ft via Cat 3(house pairs)
>
> others are relatively close to hub.
> All needs to talk to G to get out to internet.
>
> G log shows that
> !
> %LANCE-5-LATECOLL: Unit 0, late collision error
> !
>
> when we removed C out of net, it "appeared" to run without
> LATECOLL Errors.
> (I have moved to different place in the HUB but no changes.)
>
> If it is ineed C source of Late collision then can I duplicate
> via sending "large" packets to LAN while C is speaking.
> ie continous ping to C while sending "large" packet (extended ping)
> to any hosts in LAN.
>
> Here is a puzzle, I can not duplicate it. When I do that, I got some
> collision but not a lot.
>
> What is wrong?
> Any suggestions?
>
>
> TIA,
> Tatsuya
>
>
> /_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/
> Tatsuya Kawasaki
> Allegiance Telecom
> Unlock the Power of the Internet
> http://www.kivex.com
> Phone 301.215.6777 Fax 301.215.5991
> Affiliation given for identification not representation
> /_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/
>
>



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun Aug 04 2002 - 04:12:32 EDT