Steve,
running 10Mps stuff.
I will see if I can found what you are telling about.
thnx again.
Tatsuya
/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/
Tatsuya Kawasaki
Allegiance Telecom
Unlock the Power of the Internet
http://www.kivex.com
Phone 301.215.6777 Fax 301.215.5991
Affiliation given for identification not representation
/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/
On Thu, 15 Mar 2001, Steve Yingst (LMF Staff) wrote:
> Tatsuya,
>
> What speeds are you running at, while CAT3 generally will work with 10 meg,
> I wouldn't even want to touch it with a 100 meg link. The CAT5 has a
> certain amount of twists per inch, which is different for each of the four
> pair in CAT5. A good reference for this type of information as well as
> other info is... The full driver disk for an Intel Pro NIC card, I'm not
> sure if they still bundle it or not but when you expanded the disk there was
> a directory called INFO, if I'm not mistaken and in there there were a ton
> of text files all of them having to do with various standards and
> limitations, very generic information that was not strictly intel related.
> Again I'm not sure if they still give you that information but it's worth a
> try.
>
> Steve
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Tatsuya Kawasaki" <tatsuya@kivex.com>
> To: "Brian" <bri@sonicboom.org>
> Cc: <cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net>
> Sent: Thursday, March 15, 2001 2:47 PM
> Subject: Re: [nsp] a question on LATE COLLISION
>
>
> >
> > this is cat 3. That might explain...
> > Well, the fact is the rating for that cable is really cat 1.
> > using a pair to make cat3.(unsheild cat 3)
> >
> > That might be a problem.... But why can't I duplicate the problem
> > by sending a packet from/to C(which is the far away) and
> > shot packets into the LAN?
> >
> > I am searching a web site for limit on different cable type.
>
>
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun Aug 04 2002 - 04:12:32 EDT