Thats branch is far different from the ST branch.
That release also has two major security issues within
it. We are running 12.0-15.S1 which has been stable, the
only issue thats been reported on this is to do with
show interface counters but we haven't seen this at COLT.
On this code base we are using: IS-IS / OSPF / BGP4 / BGP
policy accounting / WRED / 3 port Gige, 4 port STM-4, 4 port
STM-1, 12 port DS-3, 4 port ATM OC3, 8 port FastEth, dual
RPs and high speed mode on GSR 12012 [all CSC/SFC's]. Without
any issues. We recently migrated from OSPF to IS-IS so we
know both work well [single area 0 -> single area with all routers
at level 2, anyone considering IS-IS I'd strongly recommend it].
Regards,
Neil.
-----Original Message-----
From: Christian Reichert [mailto:c.reichert@resolution.de]
Sent: 21 March 2001 08:50
To: Marcio Pilotto; cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Subject: RE: [nsp] REG: LDP
Hi !
We are running 12.0(12)S on the GSR and don't have any problems so far ...
Cisco Internetwork Operating System Software
IOS (tm) GS Software (GSR-P-M), Version 12.0(12)S, EARLY DEPLOYMENT RELEASE
SOFTWARE (fc1)
Copyright (c) 1986-2000 by cisco Systems, Inc.
Compiled Fri 04-Aug-00 19:38 by htseng
Image text-base: 0x60010950, data-base: 0x618AA000
ROM: System Bootstrap, Version 11.2(17)GS2, [htseng 180] EARLY DEPLOYMENT
RELEASE SOFTWARE (fc1)
uk-hex-p1 uptime is 16 weeks, 5 days, 5 minutes
System returned to ROM by reload
System restarted at 08:39:18 gmt Fri Nov 24 2000
System image file is "slot0:gsr-p-mz.120-12.S.bin"
Cheers,
Chris
-----Original Message-----
From: Marcio Pilotto [mailto:marcio.pilotto@intelig.net.br]
Sent: 20 March 2001 19:34
To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Subject: RE: [nsp] REG: LDP
Is this IOS stable for GSR and 7500 family? Do you have any news or
experience about this?
Marcio Pilotto
-----Original Message-----
From: Siva Valliappan [mailto:svalliap@cisco.com]
Sent: sábado, 17 de março de 2001 20:51
To: c.reichert@resolution.de
Cc: vac@dsqworld.com; cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [nsp] REG: LDP
we also support LDP in 12.0()ST starting with 12.0(10)ST.
regards
.siva
>
>
> >Thanks for the advice. When you are referring to the 12.(x) E. Are you
> referring to the 12.1.5cE8 IOS also.
>
> Yes. Any 12.1E Version officially released so far.
>
> >I am unable to view the URL sent by you. since my Cisco SmartNet ID does
> not have the privilege to view the details.
>
> Uh, I'm sorry (sometimes a partner login pays out).
>
>
> > Is there any loss in features, If I select TDP as against LDP?, & does
the
> command "tag-switching ip" enable TDP on the routers.
>
> There is no loss in feature as such, TDP is a CISCO Protocol (similar to
> LDP) but not interoperable with other Vendors. As long as you don't have
> other MPLS devices that CISCO you should use TDP for now and migrate later
> (there are migration paths. CISCOs can speak LDP and TDP at the same time
> (with the right IOS)).
>
> Cheers,
> Chris
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun Aug 04 2002 - 04:12:33 EDT