RE: [nsp] UDLD

• Next message: Tony Tauber: "Re: [nsp] first big cef issue"
• Previous message: Ryan O'Connell: "Re: [nsp] UDLD"
• Maybe in reply to: Zhang, Ou (David): "[nsp] UDLD"
• Next in thread: Andrew Metcalf: "Re: [nsp] UDLD"
• Reply: Andrew Metcalf: "Re: [nsp] UDLD"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
• Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

I've tried that. Disconnecting one fiber of a GigE link would knock down
the link (bidirectional wise) and thus won't have unidirectional link. Per
Cisco, a failed transmitter or receiver can cause a unidrectional link, but
not sure how to create that.

-David

-----Original Message-----
From: Ryan O'Connell [mailto:ryan@complicity.co.uk]
Sent: Friday, March 30, 2001 4:17 PM
To: Zhang, Ou (David)
Cc: 'cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net'
Subject: Re: [nsp] UDLD

On Fri, Mar 30, 2001 at 02:25:24PM -0500, Zhang, Ou (David) wrote:
> Has anyone done UDLD testing on Cisco 6509 switches ? I'm having a
> difficult time to create a unidiretional link on an ethernet (cat 5) link
?
> I created a unidirectional link on a GigaE link by swapping Tx between two
> adjacent ports and wonder if there are any other methods.

Yes, the fastest way is to disconnect one fibre of a GigE link.

-- 
Ryan O'Connell - <ryan@complicity.co.uk> - http://www.complicity.co.uk
I'm not losing my mind, no I'm not changing my lines,
I'm just learning new things with the passage of time

• Next message: Tony Tauber: "Re: [nsp] first big cef issue"
• Previous message: Ryan O'Connell: "Re: [nsp] UDLD"
• Maybe in reply to: Zhang, Ou (David): "[nsp] UDLD"
• Next in thread: Andrew Metcalf: "Re: [nsp] UDLD"
• Reply: Andrew Metcalf: "Re: [nsp] UDLD"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
• Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun Aug 04 2002 - 04:12:34 EDT