well, to correct the statement, of course public addressing as the subnets for
Internet access, private addresses for backend....isn't that common or am i
mistaken in my belief ??
but back to the main point, i'd appreciate any comments on routing used in SP
environments or is this not the right forum...
thanks,
Brian wrote:
> Hmm private addressing at the core? let the guessing begin, I'll say @home.
>
> Brian
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Adam Rothschild" <asr@latency.net>
> To: "Ethan" <ethan@sun.com>
> Cc: "Cisco Mailing List (NSP)" <cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net>
> Sent: Tuesday, April 17, 2001 11:26 PM
> Subject: Re: [nsp] Routing Architecture
>
> > On Tue, Apr 17, 2001 at 12:50:47PM -0400, Ethan wrote:
> > > In a typical service provider environment say one that provides
> > > co-location services, how would one propose the routing architecture ?
> > > The last one I saw divided their networks into subnets VLSM etc.. and
> > > mixture of private and public addressing with *static routing* at the
> > > core [...] ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> >
> > Out of curiosity, which provider was this?
> >
> > -adam
> >
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun Aug 04 2002 - 04:12:35 EDT