On Fri, 18 May 2001, Gert Doering wrote:
> On Thu, May 17, 2001 at 03:23:26PM -0700, Dan Hollis wrote:
> > On Thu, 17 May 2001, Charles Sprickman wrote:
> > > access-list 61 permit 192.168.0.0 0.0.0.14
> > access-list 61 permit ip 192.168.0.0 0.0.0.15 any
> As it's a simple access list, no :-) - but maybe that's the problem?
probably the incorrect netmask. i don't like cisco's 'inverse netmask's.
-Dan
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun Aug 04 2002 - 04:12:38 EDT