On Fri, 18 May 2001, George Robbins wrote:
> What are you wanting? Whether it's simple or extended, the second
> part is a wildcard mask and .14 is 00001110 which will match only
> eight even IP addresses. This is probably not what you intended.
Yep, as someone else pointed out that should be .15 (255-mask).
I also have another rule with a full C, and seeing similar results.
Anyone use this stuff, or is CAR better? This seemed more "gentle" than
CAR; at least going by how the docs described it...
I still see no affect, and I'm throwing it on a block doing about 1.5 Mb
constant and trying to keep it down to 700K/b.
I'm going to play with CAR now.
Thanks,
C
> George
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Thu, May 17, 2001 at 03:23:26PM -0700, Dan Hollis wrote:
> > > On Thu, 17 May 2001, Charles Sprickman wrote:
> > > > access-list 61 permit 192.168.0.0 0.0.0.14
> > >
> > > access-list 61 permit ip 192.168.0.0 0.0.0.15 any
> >
> > As it's a simple access list, no :-) - but maybe that's the problem?
> >
> > gert
> >
> > --
> > USENET is *not* the non-clickable part of WWW!
> > //www.muc.de/~gert/
> > Gert Doering - Munich, Germany gert@greenie.muc.de
> > fax: +49-89-35655025 gert.doering@physik.tu-muenchen.de
> >
> >
>
From jared@puck.neth;et
Received: (from jared@localhost)
by puck.nether.net (8.11.1/8.9.3) id f4IJJXZ16907
for cisco-;pu
(envelope-from jared)
Resent-Message-Id: <200105181919.f4IJJXZ16907@puck.n;r.
ReCeived: (from slist@localhost)
by puck.nether.net (8.11.1/8.9.3) id f4IHMhF13249
for jared; Fri, 18 May 2001 13:2; -
(Envelope-from cisco-nsp-request@puck.nether.net)
Date: Fri, 18 May 2001 13:22:43 -0400
X-From_: chris@obelix.hedoni;x
Received: from someone claiming to be
e3serv0.hedonism.cx (e3serv0.hedonism.cx [195.222.114.47;by
for <cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net>; Fri, 18 May 2001 13:22:38 -04;(e
Received-Date: Fri, 18 May 2001 13:22:38 -0400
Received: (from uucp@localhost)
by ;rv
for cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net; Fri, 18 May 2001 19:22:33 +0200 (M;ST
by obelix.frop.org (8.11.0/8.11.0) with ESMTP id;HM
for <cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net>; Fri, 18 May 2001 19:22:00 +0200
Received: (from chris@localhost)
by emil.frop.o;8.
for cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net; Fri, 18 May 2001 19:21:54 +0200
From: chris@obelix.hedonism.c;d-
To: Cisco NSP List <cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net>
Message-ID: <20010518192154.A4186@emi;op
MIme-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i
X-D;os
X-Envelope-To: cisco-nsp
Resent-From: jared@puck.nether.net
Resent-Date: Fri, 18 May 2001 15:1; -
ReSent-To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Subject: [nsp] Terminating PtP E1 in 3660 - NM-4E1-IMA
Hi anyone,
is it possib;o
channel-group 0 timeslot 1-15,17-31) in a NM-4E1-IMA (or 8E1) on a 3660
w;ut
It was possible on the MC3810s (only one channel-group allowed, but
that's OK) and we will upgrade to ;60
external G703<->X21 terminaladapters and using 8xSerial on the Cisco.
Chris
-- Very fu; SFrom jared@puck.neth;etReceived: (from jared@localhost) by puck.nether.net (8.11.1/8.9.3) id f4IJMXF17260 for cisco-;pu (envelope-from jared) Resent-Message-Id: <200105181922.f4IJMXF17260@puck.n;r.ReCeived: (from slist@localhost) by puck.nether.net (8.11.1/8.9.3) id f4IA44w29859 for jared; Fri, 18 May 2001 06:0; - (Envelope-from cisco-nsp-request@puck.nether.net) Date: Fri, 18 May 2001 06:04:04 -0400 X-From_: nour@netcom.co.ma ;MaReceived: from someone claiming to be mailserver.netcom.co.ma ([212.217.67.26]) by puck.nether.net (;.1 for <cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net>; Fri, 18 May 2001 06:04:03 -0400 (envelope-from nour@;omReceived-Date: Fri, 18 May 2001 06:04:03 -0400 Received: from RESEAU ([10.100.2.15]) by mailserver.netcom.co.ma wi;MT id J4NXXN16; Fri, 18 May 2001 10:22:44 -0000 Message-ID: ;e0From: "Nour Rabii" <nour@netcom.co.ma> To: <cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net> Old-Date: Sat; MMIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_009B_01C0DACA.;3AX-PRiority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4522.1200 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Micr;t X-Envelope-To: cisco-nsp Resent-From: jared@pRResent-To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Sub
This is a ;i-
------=_NextPart_000_009B_01C0DACA.4D733A20 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" ;en
hello ,
what IOS should i use in cisco3640 in order to can fram
in IOS 11 the Command " frame-relay lmi-type " don't appear on the =
Best regards .
------=_Ne;rtContent-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
<!;YP<HTML><HEAD> <META http-equiv=3DContent-Type content=3D"text/html; ;ar<META content=3D"MSHTML 5.50.4611.1300" name=3DGENERATOR> <STYLE></STYLE> </HEAD> <BODY bgColor=3D#ffff;<D<DIV><FONT face=3;al<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2> what IOS = should i=20 use&n;in" ?</FONT></DIV> <DIV> </DIV> <DIV><FONT face=3DArial ;=3frame-relay=20 lmi-type " don't appear on the configuration .</FONT></DIV> <DIV>&;;<<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>Best regards</FONT> <FONT = face=3DArial=20 size=3D2>.</FONT></DIV></BODY></HT; -
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun Aug 04 2002 - 04:12:38 EDT