RE: [nsp] bgp weights

From: Karyn Ulriksen (kulriksen@publichost.com)
Date: Fri May 25 2001 - 13:00:36 EDT


Since I do mostly content delivery I've been playing with this heavily for
the past four years. I use route maps with 3 tiered structured weights and
MEDs and pay special attention to major destinations such as 1239, 701,
7018, and some of the other transit providers (can't give away all my
secrets!). If you pay attention, you can even combine this with route
performance for optimal access. Be sure to use a real time monitor to track
the changes as they occur or you can accidentally slam a pipe. After a
while, you'll get a real feel of how to keep things steady.

K

:: -----Original Message-----
:: From: Steve Yingst (LMF Staff) [mailto:runner@lmf.net]
:: Sent: Friday, May 25, 2001 7:32 AM
:: To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
:: Subject: [nsp] bgp weights
::
::
:: I'm running bgp with two different providers. I have route
:: maps configured
:: with prepends on my advertised routes to the two providers
:: so I essentially
:: load balance my traffic to the point that neither of my
:: links gets saturated
:: and 99% of the time I know which link traffic will be coming
:: in on for a
:: certain IP address. I want to do something similar for
:: outbound traffic.
:: I want to take the same IP ranges I have defined in my
:: access lists for
:: advertised routes and match them up with traffic as it goes
:: out so basically
:: my virtual load balancing will work on outbound traffic as
:: well as inbound
:: traffic. Any ideas or examples would be appreciated. If
:: you need any more
:: information or samples of my current config please let me know.
::
:: Thanks,
::
:: Steve
::
::



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun Aug 04 2002 - 04:12:38 EDT