[nsp] [nsp] passive-interface default (was: OSPF not distributing 1 int erface)

From: Basa, Angelito A. (BasaAA@etpi.com.ph)
Date: Wed Jun 06 2001 - 20:51:23 EDT


> > Faraz Shamim wrote:
> >
> > > This feature was added via CSCdj77319. Documentation
> > > can be found in the release notes of this bug at:
> > >
> > >
> > http://www.cisco.com/cgi->
> bin/Support/Bugtool/onebug.pl?bugid=CSCdj7731
> > > 9
> > >
> > > Support for MSFC was added through CSCdr11394.
> > > Relase notes are at:
> > >
> > >
> > http://www.cisco.com/cgi->
> bin/Support/Bugtool/onebug.pl?bugid=CSCdr1139
> > > 4
> > >
> > > The problem mentioned in this e-mail that why a new
> > > interface added comes up as "no passive-interface..." is
> > fixed under
> > > CSCdr09263. Release notes are at:
> > >
> > >
> > http://www.cisco.com/cgi->
> bin/Support/Bugtool/onebug.pl?bugid=CSCdr0926
> > > 3
> > >
> > > Faraz Shamim
> > > Cisco Systems Inc.
> > > sshamim@cisco.com
> > >
>
Is this also a bug on the 7500 series (12.0(5)S)? I also configured this
"passive-interface default"
on our distribution routers or when it's more convenient to make it passive
by default
and when a new PA or VIP is installed, all new interfaces would show up as
"no passive-interface xx"
and " no ip route-cache distributed" (for VIP)
on the ospf router.

thanks,

./tito

>
>



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun Aug 04 2002 - 04:12:40 EDT