Hi,
On Thu, Jun 07, 2001 at 03:55:15PM -0400, William F. Maton wrote:
> > Not that there has been a release of non-T 12.2 for the C5RSFC either.
> > (Which makes me massively unhappy. It's a nice piece of hardware for
> > the ISP market, but is not supported very well).
> Silly rabbit, C5's are for wiring closets, not WANs! ;-)
Ummm... yes... datacenter for small ISPs (that can't afford a C6).
> > > I'm in the same boat as you. However, maybe someone will de-lurk and
> > > enlighten us.
> >
> > For the 2500, there have been promises on the IPv6-beta list (there was no
> > 12.1T-based IPv6 beta either!), but nothing either.
> It may well return, by popular demand.
I definitely hope so.
Coming to something different:
-r--r--r-- 2 ftpadmin ftpint 4680101 Jun 6 20:20 c1600-nosy-mz.122-2.T.bin
-r--r--r-- 2 ftpadmin ftpint 3409290 Jun 6 20:20 c1600-ny-mz.122-2.T.bin
-r--r--r-- 2 ftpadmin ftpint 3420988 Jun 6 20:20 c1600-oy-mz.122-2.T.bin
-r--r--r-- 2 ftpadmin ftpint 4212214 Jun 6 20:20 c1600-sy-mz.122-2.T.bin
-r--r--r-- 2 ftpadmin ftpint 3229571 Jun 6 20:20 c1600-y-mz.122-2.T.bin
can someone point me to a feature matrix that describes which image
contains what? IPv6 seems to hide in "plus" (-sy), which I can't test
easily right now (my home 1600 has only 4 Mb of flash *sigh*).
gert
--
USENET is *not* the non-clickable part of WWW!
//www.muc.de/~gert/
Gert Doering - Munich, Germany gert@greenie.muc.de
fax: +49-89-35655025 gert.doering@physik.tu-muenchen.de
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun Aug 04 2002 - 04:12:40 EDT