Hi,
On Thu, Jun 07, 2001 at 02:00:32PM -0700, David Sinn wrote:
> The problem with the 2500 images for 12.2T is that in uncompress form
> they are taking more then 16MB of RAM.
While I'm sure this is true for things like "enterprise plus IPSEC", I
think this is unlikely for basic IP+IPv6 - the latest beta image I have is
this:
-rw-r--r-- 1 gert daemon 3943951 Nov 10 2000 c2500-p-mz.20001101
which extends to about 8.5 Mbytes in the router - 16 Mb DRAM are there,
and "show mem" has a "Total" of 7.6 Mb after booting. 12.2T might
reduce that by 1-2 more megs, but not *so* much...
> I would not hold my breath for a C5RSM or C5RSFC image either. They are
> pretty much dead products in Cisco's eyes.
Sounds like "time for a Juniper-on-a-Stick" for VLAN routing. *sigh*.
gert
--
USENET is *not* the non-clickable part of WWW!
//www.muc.de/~gert/
Gert Doering - Munich, Germany gert@greenie.muc.de
fax: +49-89-35655025 gert.doering@physik.tu-muenchen.de
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun Aug 04 2002 - 04:12:40 EDT