Re: [nsp] GEIP vs. GEIP+

From: Robert E. Seastrom (rs@seastrom.com)
Date: Thu Jun 14 2001 - 19:00:19 EDT

Next message: Alex Rubenstein: "Re: [nsp] GEIP vs. GEIP+"
Previous message: Rafael A. Reta Rodriguez: "Re: NAT problem"
Next in thread: Alex Rubenstein: "Re: [nsp] GEIP vs. GEIP+"
Reply: Alex Rubenstein: "Re: [nsp] GEIP vs. GEIP+"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

Alex Rubenstein <alex@nac.net> writes:

> It's supported by the somewhat-stable 12.0S train; we've got two GEIP+'s
> happy on 12.0.14S and 12.0.17S

With or without dot1q?

---Rob

Next message: Alex Rubenstein: "Re: [nsp] GEIP vs. GEIP+"
Previous message: Rafael A. Reta Rodriguez: "Re: NAT problem"
Next in thread: Alex Rubenstein: "Re: [nsp] GEIP vs. GEIP+"
Reply: Alex Rubenstein: "Re: [nsp] GEIP vs. GEIP+"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun Aug 04 2002 - 04:12:42 EDT