[nsp] RR-Cluster ID

• Next message: Thomas Kernen: "serial port operation above 2048Kbps for sat circuit"
• Previous message: Routing Junkie: "Re: [nsp] Access lists and uplink-redirect"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
• Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

The recent version of IOS Essentials from Cisco states that RR-Cluster ID's
may not be the best configuration method when building a route reflector
hierarchy. Can anyone comment on this, I thought implementing RR-Cluster
ID's was considered best practice when building a redundant topology with
dual route-reflectors peering with the same clients.

thanks

_________________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com

• Next message: Thomas Kernen: "serial port operation above 2048Kbps for sat circuit"
• Previous message: Routing Junkie: "Re: [nsp] Access lists and uplink-redirect"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
• Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun Aug 04 2002 - 04:12:44 EDT