Re: Packet size and packet/sec.

From: Ryan O'Connell (ryan@complicity.co.uk)
Date: Fri Jul 13 2001 - 08:38:03 EDT

Next message: Jean-Christophe Varaillon: "Re: Packet size and packet/sec. (fwd)"
Previous message: Jean-Christophe Varaillon: "Packet size and packet/sec."
In reply to: Jean-Christophe Varaillon: "Packet size and packet/sec."
Next in thread: Paul P. Pongco: "Re: serial port operation above 2048Kbps for sat circuit"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

On Fri, Jul 13, 2001 at 01:29:33PM +0100, Jean-Christophe Varaillon wrote:
> The CPU utilization rate is around 90%.
>
> I am looking for a reason why.
>
> I would like to know how small packets should be and how many they should
> be to increase significantly the CPU rate of my 3640 router.

Try "show proc cpu" and find the process that's eating up all the CPU time.

A 3640 chassis should be able to handle a throuhput of 50-100Mb/s even with
quite small packets.

-- Ryan O'Connell - <ryan@complicity.co.uk> - http://www.complicity.co.uk

I'm not losing my mind, no I'm not changing my lines, I'm just learning new things with the passage of time

Next message: Jean-Christophe Varaillon: "Re: Packet size and packet/sec. (fwd)"
Previous message: Jean-Christophe Varaillon: "Packet size and packet/sec."
In reply to: Jean-Christophe Varaillon: "Packet size and packet/sec."
Next in thread: Paul P. Pongco: "Re: serial port operation above 2048Kbps for sat circuit"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun Aug 04 2002 - 04:12:44 EDT