Rick,
As Bill said, deploying QoS will not reduce the number
of packet drops, it will however allow you to define
what type of packets are dropped.
Waving the magic QoS wand does not create bandwidth.
If you plan you add video, you will need to increase
the size of those pipes. If you are looking to do
VoIP, you will want something like PQ-CBWFQ (LLQ).
That will allow a strict priority for VoIP and then
allow you to use WFQ to keep your other flows from
stomping on each other.
Also, depending on your fanout rate on those T1's,
make sure your broadcast queue is sufficient.
Keep in mind that anything like FRTS will have an
impact on your CPU. FRTS is often useful for the
fragmentation (FRF.11 or FRF.12 don't recall it's been
a while) support which reduces jitter when you have a
slow port speed.
Hope this helps....
--- "Cheung, Rick" <Rick.Cheung@NextelPartners.com>
wrote:
> Hi. I have a question on frame relay congestion
> management. We have
> a hub and spoke environment, with several T1s
> originating at the hub, that
> connects about 50 sites via 128 or 256kbps CIR and
> 512kbps port speed.
>
> We are seeing above 2% discards on the hub end for
> outgoing packets
> out of each T1 interface. We do not have any Frame
> traffic shaping, or QOS
> enabled yet in the infrastructure.
>
> We are looking to deploy video streaming over the
> enterprise, and
> potentially VOIP or VOFR in the future.
>
> I am thinking of implementing frame relay traffic
> shaping, via rate
> enforcement.
>
> I'm not as certain about selecting the correct
> queueing method. I've
> read that Flow based WFQ is FECN, BECN aware, but
> may not be as granular as
> Class based WFQ.
>
> What has been your experience as being the best
> queueing method in a
> Frame environment?
>
>
>
> Thanks
> Rick
>
>
>
>
>
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Get personalized email addresses from Yahoo! Mail
http://personal.mail.yahoo.com/
From jared@puck.nethõÅ;et
Received: (from jared@localhost)
by puck.nether.net (8.11.4/8.9.3) id f6G2aRZ24231
for cisco-õÅ;pu
(envelope-from jared)
Resent-Message-Id: <200107160236.f6G2aRZ24231@puck.nõÅ;r.
ReCeived: (from slist@localhost)
by puck.nether.net (8.11.4/8.9.3) id f6G2UCl24193
for jared; Sun, 15 Jul 2001 22:3õÅ; -
(Envelope-from cisco-nsp-request@puck.nether.net)
Date: Sun, 15 Jul 2001 22:30:12 -0400
X-From_: thchiang@ihendersonõÅ;
Received: from someone claiming to be
mail.ihenderson.com ([202.123.77.1])
by puck.nether.net õÅ;1.
for <cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net>; Sun, 15 Jul 2001 22:30:11 -0400
(envelope-from thchõÅ;@i
Received-Date: Sun, 15 Jul 2001 22:30:11 -0400
Received: from ntwel01.ihenderson.com ([202.123.77.197]) by õÅ;.i
Mon, 16 Jul 2001 10:33:43 +0800
Received: by NTWEL01 with InternÙëÅ;ai
Message-ID: <E15B66ADBAB6D4118A0D0006293369090B43EõÅ;WE
FrOm: TH Chiang <thchiang@ihenderson.com>
To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Old-Date: Mon, 16 Jul 2001 10:31:05 +0800
MIMõÅ;rs
X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2650.21)
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
boundary="----_=_NextPart_001õÅ;10
X-Diagnostic: Not on the accept list
X-Envelope-To: cisco-nsp
Resent-From: jared@puck.nether.net
Resent-DateõÅ;n,
Resent-To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Subject: [nsp] unsubscribe
This message is in MIME formaõÅ;in
this format, some or all of this message may not be legible.
----
Content-Type: text/plain
Hi all,
Sorry for such a silly questi
Thanks
TH
------_=_NextPart_001_01C10D9F.5D48FAB0
Content-Type: text/html
<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//ÙëÅ;HT
<
<META NAME="Generator" CõÅ;NT
<TITLE>unsubscribe</TITLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY>
<P><FONT SIZE=2 FACE="Arial">Hi all,ÙëÅ;NT
<P><FO
</P>
<P><FONT SIZE=2 FACE="Arial">Thanks</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=2 FACE="Arial">TH</FONT>
</P>
</BODY>
</HTML>
--õÅ;_=
From kf@reign.sk MoõÅ;l
Received: from someone claiming to be
reign.sk (w31nb048.via.at [194.96.201.48])
by puck.nether.net (8õÅ;4/
for <cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net>; Mon, 16 Jul 2001 04:06:22 -0400
(envelope-from kf@reigõÅ;)
X-Server: Advanced Direct Remailer (www.elcomsoft.com)
Repl
To: "'jakasemboeng'" <jakasemboeng@ekilat.com>, <cisco-
Subject: RE: [nsp] L2TPõÅ;wo
DatE: Mon, 16 Jul 2001 10:06:14 +0200
Message-ID: <000c01c10dce$2f99b0b0$01010101@reign.sk>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-õÅ;:
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-MaileõÅ;ic
In-Reply-To: <NFBBLCJNJHMIBFGDPBHKKEFCDCAA.jakasemboeng@ekilat.com>
X-MimeÙëÅ; P
The L2TP tunnel has nothing to do with AS's. The IP path õÅ;ra
L2TP is PPP tunneled inside IP or over IP (like you want) (with further
possibility of encryption using IPSec). õÅ;mi
LNS. You dialing to the LAC and based on the L2TP settings the call will be
tunneled to the LNõÅ; t
Alex
-----Original Message-----
From: jakasemboeng [mailto:jakasemboeng@ekilat.com]
Sent: Saturday, õÅ; 1
To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Subject: [nsp] L2TP networks
Hi all
Is it possible for L2TP tunneling go õÅ;ug
Say, I'm in Hongkong and want to connect my branch at Singapore
I dial in to LAC UUnet (õÅ;00
Singapore using Singtel (AS 781).
Thanks for your attention.
Thanks
Jaka
From kf@reign.sk MoõÅ;l
Received: from someone claiming to be
reign.sk (w31nb048.via.at [194.96.201.48])
by puck.nether.net (8õÅ;4/
for <cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net>; Mon, 16 Jul 2001 04:15:58 -0400
(envelope-from kf@reigõÅ;)
X-Server: Advanced Direct Remailer (www.elcomsoft.com)
Repl
To: "'Dmitri Kalintsev'" <dek@hades.uz>, <cisco-nsp@puc
Date: Mon, 16 Jul 2001 10:15:56 +0200
Message-ID: <000d01c10dcf$8a74b420$01010101@reign.sk>
MõÅ;Ve
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="koi8-r"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
X-MSMail-PriõÅ;y:
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook CWS, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2911.0)
In-Reply-To: <025501c10a9c$a4ab7300$4d0508d2@cca.off.õÅ;ec
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4522.1200
Importance: Normal
Just short answer for the bundles..õÅ;im
with 2 PRI's connected. I've tryed to connect withõÅ;ES
AS's and tryed to negotiated 30 PPP multilinks .....
Gueessss...what happened.......
The Nortel goes awõÅ;..
..eh...It took's around 30 sec of CPU 100% and all traffic (on the secoõÅ;1
So..... I've decide to create an bundle with 8 channels and performance was
better....Mean, that theõÅ;ot
was interrupted also for such time.....
Alex
P.S. Both AS's was connectedõÅ;th
of the 30 channels negotiation, there was a pretty much errors on E1's....
-----õÅ;in
From: Dmitri Kalintsev [mailto:dek@hades.uz]
Sent: Thursday, July 12, 2001 8:34 AM
To: cisco-nsp@puck.nethõÅ;et
Hi good people,
Does anybody have real-world experince ruõÅ;g
concentrator? Of real interest are the following areas:
1. BGP support: features and stability, cõÅ;re
2. How many PRI cards will box take, provided *no* digital modems are
installed?
3. How good is õÅ;il
multilink bundles, say from 2 to 8 B-channels?
4. What is the recommenõÅ;IO
12.2XA?), because we will need "user max-links" support.
Thanks,
-- CCNP,õÅ;P CDPlayer@irc Network Architect @ connect.com.au dek @ cõÅ;ct http://-UNAVAIL- UIN:7150410 mobile: +61 414 821 382From alfredo@intelidõÅ;coReceived: from someone claiming to be s1.intelideas.com (s1.intelideas.com [194.145.140.10])õÅ; p for <cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net>; Mon, 16 Jul 2001 06:28:06 -0400õÅ;nvReceived-Date: Mon, 16 Jul 2001 06:28:06 -0400 Received: from postal.claudio-coello.intõÅ;ea by s1.intelideas.com (8.11.0/8.10.1) with ESMTP id õÅ;S4 Mon, 16 Jul 2001 12:28:04 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from intelideas.com (dhcp-100.claudio-coello. By postal.claudio-coello.intelideas.net (8.11.0/8.11.0/SuSE Linux 8.11. Mon, 16 õÅ;20X-Authentication-Warning: postal.claudio-coello.intelideas.net: Host dhcp-100.claudio-coello.intelideas õÅ;.1Message-ID: <3B52C1B3.FB1C0CAB@intelideas.com> Date: Mon, 16 Jul 2001 12:28:03 +020õÅ;omOrganization: Intelideas X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.77 [en] (Windows NT 5.0; U) X-Accept-õÅ;uaMIME-Version: 1.0 To: Thomas Kernen <tkernen@deckpoint.ch> CC: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject: Re: serial porõÅ;erReferences: <Pine.GSO.4.32.0107091115420.24718-100000@sj-cse-425.cisco.com> <001501c1õÅ;$0Content-Type: text/põÅ;; Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
> I'm quite interested on trying this on a 2620.. but AFAIK the NM-4õÅ;is> can do the job?
Well, a short search in cisco.cõÅ;matells us that WIC-2T can't (http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/pcat/sewn__y2.htm). NõÅ;urpointed out, the multiport serials aren't supporõÅ;in(with the exception of the ATM), so I'd say that the best would be to get hold of a 3620.
> ----- OriginõÅ;es> From: "Alfredo Sola" <alfredo@intelideas.com> > To: "Thomas Kernen" <tkernen@deckpoint.ch> > Cc: <cisco-nsp@põÅ;ne> Sent: Friday, July 13, 2001 12:05 PM > Subject: Re: serial port operation above 2048Kbps for sat circuit > > õÅ;ho> > > will deliver a 3Mbps full duplex circuit onto one V.35 port, AFAIK > only > > a few Cisco serial interfaces suõÅ;t > > (PA-4T do this I believe). Does anyone have some experience with this > > type of setuõÅ;ey> > Beginning with the 2600, the serials will support up to 8 Mbps. > Depending on the platform, you will nõÅ;to> the same PA/NM. See for instance > http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/cc/pd/rt/3600/prodlit/se\18õÅ;ds> the NM stuff, > http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/cable/cab_rout/cfig_nts/ > 4159m4tp/4159over.htõÅ;fo> > -- > Alfredo Sola > Director técnico
-- Alfredo Sola Director técnico
From elijah@netvisioõÅ;t.Received: from someone claiming to be netmon.netvision.net.il (netmon.netvision.net.il [194õÅ;1. by for <cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net>; Mon, 16 Jul 2001 06:46õÅ;-0 (eNvelope-from elijah@netvision.net.il) Received-Date: Mon, 16 Jul 2001 06:46:51 -0400 Received: from localhost (elijõÅ;oc by netmon.netvision.net.il (8.9.3/8.9.3/Debian 8.9.3-21) with ESMTP id NAA16440 for <cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net>;õÅ;, X-Authentication-Warning: netmon.netvision.net.il: elijah owned process doing -bs Date: Mon, 16õÅ; 2From: Elijah Kagan <elijah@netvision.net.il> To: <cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net> Message-ID: <Pine.LNõÅ;33MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Subject:õÅ;p]
I am currently running 12.0(15)S3 on 7200VxR with NPE-400 and C7200-I/O-õÅ;E
I have a terrible packet loss on both ethernet ports whenever they are participating in some routing protoõÅ;an
Did anyone came across such an oddity? Can anyone recommend an IOS for this kind of hardw
Elijah
From sthaug@nethelp.õÅ;MoReceived: from someone claiming to be verdi.nethelp.no (verdi.nethelp.no [158.36.41.162]) by pucõÅ;th for <cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net>; Mon, 16 Jul 2001 06:55:25 -0400 (enveloõÅ;roReceived-Date: Mon, 16 Jul 2001 06:55:25 -0400 Received: (qmail 5942 invoked by uid 1001); 16 Jul 200õÅ;:5To: elijah@netvision.net.il Cc: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject: Re: [nsp] Which IOS foFrom: sthaug@nethelp.no In-Reply-To: Your message of "Mon, 16 JuReferences: <PiõÅ;NXX-Mailer: Mew version 1.05+ on Emacs 19.34.2 Mime-Version: 1.0 C×ëÅ;ntMessage-ID: <5940.995280922@verdi.nethelp.no>
>õÅ; a
We're running 12.1(7a)E1 on our NPE-400 boxes.
Steinar Haug, Nethelp c
From jverde@red3i.esõÅ;n Received: from someone claiming to be mx1.inycom.net (mx1.red3i.net [212.75.160.83]) by puck.netheõÅ;t for <cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net>; Mon, 16 Jul 2001 07:07:00 -0400 (envelope-froõÅ;erReceived-Date: Mon, 16 Jul 2001 07:07:00 -0400 Received: from ZAR430 (pnt170.inycom.es [192.168.4.170]) by mõÅ;ny for <cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net>; Mon, 16 Jul 2001 13:06:38 +0200 MessagõÅ;: From: "Juan C. Verde" <jverde@red3i.es> To: <cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net> ReferencesõÅ;inSubject: Re: serial port operation aboõÅ;04Date: Mon, 16 Jul 2001 13:05:53 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859õÅ;CoX-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2919.6700 XõÅ;eO
Hi Alfredo (nice to meet you here too :)
> Well, a short search in cisõÅ;om> tells us that WIC-2T can't > (http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/pcat/sewn__y2\18õÅ;).> about the WIC-1T, but I think it will probably be limited to 2M. As you
Docs about this issue are confusing. õÅ;in( http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/cc/pd/rt/2600/prodlit/2636m_ds.htm ) you can see the õÅ;ghNMs, so I understand it could be theoretically possible to reacõÅ;ghspeeDs than 2Mbps per port in a WIC-2T or even 8Mbps with a WIC-1T, assuming the card itself is able to deal with this õÅ;d.supported in "old" -legacy- 3600 NMs).
Cheers. -- Juan C. Verde INSTRUMENTACION Y COMPONENTES, SA ×ëFrom swmike@swm.pp.sõÅ;onReceived: from someone claiming to be uplift.swm.pp.se (root@swm.pp.se [195.54.133.5]) by puck.neõÅ;.n for <cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net>; Mon, 16 Jul 2001 07:09:22 -0400 (envelope-õÅ; sReceived-Date: Mon, 16 Jul 2001 07:09:22 -0400 Received: from localhost (swmike@localhost) by uplift.swmõÅ;se for <cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net>; Mon, 16 Jul 2001 13:09:16 +0200 Date: Mon, 16õÅ; 2From: Mikael Abrahamsson <swmike@swm.pp.se> To: <cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net> Subject: Re: [nsp] WõÅ; IIn-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.33.0107161334170.16240-100000@netmon.netvision.net.il> MõÅ;geOrganization: People's Front Against WWW MIME-Version: 1.0õÅ;te
On Mon, 16 Jul 2001, Elijah Kagan wrote:
> I am currently running 12.0(15)S3 on 72õÅ;R > C7200-I/O-2FE/E IO controller. > > I have a terrible packet loss on both ethernet ports whenever they >õÅ; p> > Did anyone came across such an oddity? > Can aõÅ;e
Sounds to me you're having some duplex problem. Could you please post "show iõÅ;forelated.
-- Mikael Abrahamsson email: swmike@swm.pp.se
From kf@reign.sk MoõÅ;l Received: from someone claiming to be reign.sk (w31nb048.via.at [194.96.201.48]) by puck.nether.net (8õÅ;4/ for <cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net>; Mon, 16 Jul 2001 07:09:25 -0400 (envelope-from kf@reigõÅ;) X-Server: Advanced Direct Remailer (www.elcomsoft.com) ReplTo: "'Elijah Kagan'" <elijah@netvision.net.il>, <cisco-Subject: RE: [nsp] WhicõÅ;S Date: Mon, 16 Jul 2001 13:09:20 +0200 Message-ID: <001401c10de7$c3e86b80$01010101@reõÅ;skContent-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) XõÅ;aiX-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook CWS, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2911.0) In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.33.0107161334170.õÅ;0-X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4522.1200 Importance: Normal
I'm running oõÅ;e as boot c7200-kboot-mz.121-7.E.bin as system 120-17.S1
Using ISL ...and no probs..
Alex
-----Original MessaõÅ;--Sent: Monday, July 16, 2001 12:47 PM To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net SõÅ;ct
I am currently running 12.0(15)S3 on 7200VxR with NPE-400 and C7õÅ;I/
I have a terrible packet loss on both ethernet ports whenever they are participating in some routiõÅ;ro
Did anyone came across such an oddity? Can anyone recommend an IOS for this kind
Thanks,
Elijah
From niels=cisco-nspõÅ;keReceived: from someone claiming to be deep.trance.org (postfix@deep.trance.org [194.134.õÅ;7] for <cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net>; Mon, 16 Jul 2001 07:09:4õÅ;40Received-Date: Mon, 16 Jul 2001 07:09:46 -0400 Received: by deep.trance.org õÅ;tf id C877211532; Mon, 16 Jul 2001 13:09:44 +0200 (CEST) Date: Mon, 16 Jul 2001 13:09:44 +0200 From: NiõÅ;BaTo: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject: Re: [nsp] Which IOS for 7206VxR, NPE-400, C7200-IõÅ;FEMessAge-ID: <20010716130944.J10084@trance.org> Mail-Followup-To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net References: <Pine.LNX.4.33.0õÅ;61Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii IN-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.33.0107161334170.16240-100000@netmon.netvision.
* elijah@netvision.net.il (Elijah Kagan) [Mon 16 Jul 2001, 12:51 CEST]: > I am currently runõÅ; 1> C7200-I/O-2FE/E IO controller. > > I have a terrible packet loss on both ethernetõÅ;ts> are participating in some routing protocol and have above 2Mbps utilization. > > Did anyone came across õÅ; a
This may be overly obvious, but did you check (and nail down) duplex settings on those ports?
-- Niels.
-- õÅ; a
From elijah@netvisioõÅ;t.Received: from someone claiming to be netmon.netvision.net.il (netmon.netvision.net.il [194õÅ;1. by for <cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net>; Mon, 16 Jul 2001 07:23õÅ;-0 (eNvelope-from elijah@netvision.net.il) Received-Date: Mon, 16 Jul 2001 07:23:23 -0400 Received: from localhost (elijõÅ;oc by netmon.netvision.net.il (8.9.3/8.9.3/Debian 8.9.3-21) with ESMTP id OAA12631; Mon, 16 Jul 2001 14:23:12 +0300õÅ;utDate: Mon, 16 Jul 2001 14:23:12 +0300 (IDT) FõÅ; ETo: Mikael Abrahamsson <swmike@swm.pp.se> cc: <cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net> Subject: RõÅ;nsIn-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.33.0107161307540.2352-100000@uplift.swm.pp.se>õÅ;saMIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type:
This is not a duplex issue.
-- elijah
On Mon, 16 Jul 2001, Mikael Ab
> On Mon, 16 Jul 2001, EliõÅ;Ka> > > I am currently running 12.0(15)S3 on 7200VxR with NPE-400 and > > C7200-I/O-2FE/E IO controller. > > > > õÅ;ve> > are participating in some routing protocol and have aboveõÅ;ps> > > > Did anyone came across such an oddity? > > Can anyone recommend an IOS for this kind of hardware? > õÅ;un> "show int" for these interfaces. It's pretty easy to sõÅ;if> related. > > -- > Mikael Abrahamsson email: swmike@swm.pp.se >
From gert@greenie.muõÅ; Received: from someone claiming to be greenie.muc.de (root@greenie.muc.de [193.149.48.161]) byõÅ;k. for <cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net>; Mon, 16 Jul 2001 08:55:14 -0400 (enõÅ;peReceived-Date: Mon, 16 Jul 2001 08:55:14 -0400 Received: by greenie.muc.de via rmail with stdiõÅ;d for cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net; Mon, 16 Jul 2001 14:55:20 +0200 (MEST) (Smail-3.2 1996-JõÅ; #Received: (from gert@localhost) by mobile.greenie.muc.de (8.11.0/8.11.0) id f6GBqQH02530; Mon, 16 Jul 2õÅ;13Date: Mon, 16 Jul 2001 13:52:26 +0200 From: Gert Doering <gert@greenie.muc.de> To: Elijah Kagan <elijah@netviÛëÅ;.nAc: cisMessage-ID: <20010õÅ;35References: <Pine.LNX.4.33.0107161334170.16240-100000@netmon.netvision.net.il> Mime-Version: 1.0õÅ;teContent-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.33.0107õÅ;34X-mgetty-õÅ;:
Hi,
On Mon, Jul 16, 2001 at 01:46:48PM +0300, Elijah Kagan wrote: > I am currently runnÛëÅ;12> > I have a terrible packet loss on both ethernet õÅ;s > are participating in some routing protocol and have above 2Mbps utilization. > > Did anyone came across sõÅ;an> Can anyone recommend an IOS for this kind of hardware?
I run 12.0(14)S3 on my NPE400/C7200-I/O-2FE/E, and it wÛëÅ; ua@out 20
gert -- Gert Doering Mobile communications ... right nowõÅ;ti
From jared@puck.nethõÅ;etReceived: (from jared@localhost) by puck.nether.net (8.11.4/8.9.3) id f6GDk3M14957 for cisco-õÅ;pu (envelope-from jared) Resent-Message-Id: <200107161346.f6GDk3M14957@puck.nõÅ;r.ReCeived: (from slist@localhost) by puck.nether.net (8.11.4/8.9.3) id f6G8ZVk32260 for jared; Mon, 16 Jul 2001 04:3õÅ; - (Envelope-from cisco-nsp-request@puck.nether.net) Date: Mon, 16 Jul 2001 04:35:31 -0400 X-From_: Andrey.Rassiysky@eqÛëÅ;.c ginsslon.globalone.net (firewall-user@[204.59.5.196])õÅ; p for <cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net>; Mon, 16 Jul 2001 04:35:30 -0400 õÅ;veReceived-Date: Mon, 16 Jul 2001 04:35:30 -0400 Received: by ginsslon.globalone.net;õÅ;IAReceived: from unknown(160.81.138.72) by ginsslon.globalone.net via smap (V5.5) id õÅ;21Received: from master1.lon.globalone.net (unverified) by mailgw02.lon.globalone.net (CõÅ;ntReceived: from pop2.lon.globalone.net (pop2.lon.globalone.net [160.81.138.28]) by master1.lonõÅ;baReceived: fõÅ;EQ (Netscape Messaging Server 3.62) with SMTP id 462 õÅ; fMessage-ID: <000801c10e04$a472a780$d412a8c0@EQUANTBWXTG9PFõÅ;omTo: <cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net> Old-Date: Mon, 16 Jul 2001 17:36:02 +03õÅ;IMContent-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0005_01C10E1D.C8D49520" X-Priority: 3 X-õÅ;ilX-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4133.2õÅ;X-X-Envelope-To: cisco-nsp Resent-From: jared@puck.nether.net Resent-Date: Mon, 16 Jul 20õÅ;9:Resent-To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject: [nsp] Cisco 36xx as a PE router with CoS
This is a multi-part mõÅ;ge
------=_NextPart_000_0005_01C10E1D.C8D49520 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="koi8-r" Content-TransferõÅ;od
Hi,
Has anyone expierence with using a Cisco 36xx as a PE router with CoS = (CBWFQ and WRED) impleõÅ;at
BEst regards, --andrey
------=_NextPart_000_0005_01C10E1D.C8D49520 Content-Type: text/html; charset="koi8-r" ConteõÅ;ra
<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN"> <HTML><HEAD> <META contenõÅ;"t<META content=3D"MSHTML 5.00.3103.1000" name=3DGENERATOR> <STYLE></ÛëÅ;E><BODY<DIV> </DIV> <DIV><FONT face=3D"AÛëÅ; Cas a PE router with CoS (CBWFQ and WRED) implementation?</õÅ;><<DIV> </DIV> <DIV><FONT face=3D"Arial CYR" size=3D2>Best regards,</FONT></DIV> <DIV><FONT face=3D"Arial CYR" = õÅ;=3
------=_NextPart_000_0005_01C10E1D.C8D49520--
From jared@puck.nethõÅ;etReceived: (from jared@localhost) by puck.nether.net (8.11.4/8.9.3) id f6GFlOq18356 for cisco-ÛëÅ;puResent-Message-Id: <200107161547.f6GFlOq18356@puck.nõÅ;r.ReCeived: (from slist@localhost) by puck.nether.net (8.11.4/8.9.3) id f6GFfh018317 for jared; Mon, 16 Jul 2001 11:4õÅ; - (Envelope-from cisco-nsp-request@puck.nether.net) Date: Mon, 16 Jul 2001 11:41:43 -0400 X-From_: chris@chrisland.netõÅ;n Received: from someone claiming to be gw.chrisland.net (cm61-18-144-148.hkcable.com.hk [61.18.144.1õÅ; for <cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net>; Mon, 16 Jul 2001 11:41:41 -ÛëÅ; Received: from chrisland.net (super.intõÅ;is by gw.chrisland.net (8.11.3/8.11.3) with ESMTP id f6GFfVP98195; Mon, 16 Jul 2001 23:41:32 +0800õÅ;T)Message-ID: <3B530B2B.E2877CC2@chrisland.net> Old-Date: Mon, 16 Jul 2001 23:41:31 +0õÅ;FrOrganization: Chrisland X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.76 [en] (Windows NT 5.0; U) X-Accept-Language:õÅ;pdTo: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject: number of BGP routes received and advertised Content-Type: textõÅ;inContent-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Diagnostic: Not on the accept list X-Envelope-To: cisco-nsp Resent-FrõÅ;jaResent-Date: Mon, 16 Jul 2001 11:47:24 -0400 Resent-To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Greetings,
I wouldÛëÅ;e and advertised to a peer. From "sh ip bgp nei xxx", the lines õÅ; aclosEd are:
<...> Prefix advertised 2361, suppressed 301, withdrawn 165 <...> Number of unicast/multicast prefixesõÅ;ei 0 denied but saved unicast prefixes consume 0 bytes of memory 0 history unicast paths consume 0 bytes of memõÅ;<.
buT I don't think they are. For advertised, 2361-301-164 not equal to what it is sending. For received, the peer isõÅ;di(by "sh ip bgp nei xxx received-routes"). I am only permitting some of them (total=774) by route-maps. õÅ; r
Any ideas?
Thanks.
Chris
From jared@puck.nethõÅ;etReceived: (from jared@localhost) by puck.nether.net (8.11.4/8.9.3) id f6GFtKF19874 for cisco-ÛëÅ;puResent-Message-Id: <200107161555.f6GFtKF19874@puck.nõÅ;r.ReCeived: (from slist@localhost) by puck.nether.net (8.11.4/8.9.3) id f6GFsxd19850 for jared; Mon, 16 Jul 2001 11:5õÅ; - (Envelope-from cisco-nsp-request@puck.nether.net) Date: Mon, 16 Jul 2001 11:54:59 -0400 X-From_: rbansal@aol.net MoõÅ;l Received: from someone claiming to be mailbox.office.aol.com (pix2-213.pix.aol.com [152.163.191.213]) õÅ;uc for <cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net>; Mon, 16 Jul 2001 11:54:58 -0400 õÅ;elReceived-Date: Mon, 16 Jul 2001 11:54:58 -0400 Received: from pcsn714466 (dhcp0-031-002.office.aõÅ;om by mailbox.office.aol.com (8.8.7/8.7.3) with ESMTP id LAA24177; Mon, 16 Jul 2001 11:54:38 -0400 (EDõÅ;roTo: "Chris" <chris@chrisland.net>, <cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net> Subject: RE: number of BGõÅ;utOld-Date: Mon, 16 Jul 2001 11:54:34 -0400 Message-ID: <NFBBJIFGHMKFKMGMOMAEIEEPCCAA.rbansal@aolÚëÅ;> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) XõÅ;aiX-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0) In-Reply-To: <3B530B2B.E2877CC2@chrisland.ÛëÅ; IX-Diagnostic: Not on the accept list X-EnvelopeõÅ; cResent-From: jared@puck.nether.net Resent-Date: Mon, 16 Jul 2001 11:55:20 -0400 Resent-To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.õÅ; dshoW ip bgp neigh x.x.x.x adv to show how many advertised
do a show ip bgp neig x.x.x.x rout to see how many receivõÅ; -From: Chris [mailto:chris@chrisland.net] Sent: Monday, July 16, 2001 11:42 AM To: cisco-nsp@puckõÅ;heSUbject: number of BGP routes received and advertised
Greetings,
I would like to know how to find out number of BõÅ;ouand advertised to a peer. From "sh ip bgp nei xxx", the lines that are closed are:
<...> Prefix adveõÅ;ed<...> Number of unicast/multicast prefixes received 774/0 0 denied but saved unicõÅ;pr 0 history unicast paths consume 0 bytes of memory <...>
but I don't think they are. FõÅ;dvwhat it is sending. For received, the peer is sending me full routes (by "sh ip bgp neõÅ;x them (total=774) by route-maps.
The routers are running 12.0.16S or S1.
Thanks.
Chris
From Damon.Pegg@carrõÅ;.cReceived: from someone claiming to be lon-nsmx-01.carrier1.net (lon-nsmx-01.carrier1.net [2õÅ;.1 by puck.nether.net (8.11.4/8.9.3) with ESMTP id f6GFxuA21041 for <cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net>; Mon, 16 Jul 2001 1õÅ;:5 (envelope-from Damon.Pegg@carrier1.com) Received-Date: Mon, 16 Jul 2001 11:59:56 -0400 Received: from exchange.caõÅ;r1 by lon-nsmx-01.carrier1.net with esmtp (Exim 3.22 #3) id 15MAn9-0005QZ-01õÅ;n,Received: by GBLON1S07 with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) id <3V47AAMQ>; Mon, 16 Jul 20ÛëÅ;6:MeFrom: Pegg Damon <Damon.Pegg@carrier1.com> ToõÅ;RaSubject: RE: number of BGP routes received and advertised Date: MoõÅ;6 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) Content-Type: text/plain; charsetõÅ;o-
The correct way is as follows:
just do a sh ip bgp sum and look at the column on the right for each peer for totõÅ;ec
sh ip bgp neigh x.x.x.x received-routes sh ip bgp neigh x.x.x.x aõÅ;ti
But an exact number of advertised routes is hard to attain on eBGP. You basically need to check how many it qõÅ;s Other vendors have functionality to check advertised prefixes within the sh ip bgp sum buõÅ;as
> -----Original Message----- > From: Raj Bansal [mailto:rbansal@aol.net] > Sent: 16 July 2001 16:55 > To: cisõÅ;sp> Subject: RE: number of BGP routes received and advertised > > > do a > show ip bgp neigh x.x.x.x adv õÅ;o > > do a > show ip bgp neig x.x.x.x rout > to see how many received > > > -----Original MessaõÅ;--> Sent: Monday, July 16, 2001 11:42 AM > To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net > SubjõÅ; n> > > Greetings, > > I would like to know how to find out number of BGP rouõÅ; >> and advertised to a peer. From "sh ip bgp nei xxx", the > lines that are > closed are: > > <...> > PõÅ;x > <...> > Number of unicast/multicast prefixes received 774/0 > 0 denieõÅ;t > 0 history unicast paths consume 0 bytes of memory > <...> > > but I õÅ;t > what it is sending. For received, the peer is sending me fulõÅ;ut> (bY "sh ip bgp nei xxx received-routes"). I am only > permitting some of > them (total=774) by route-maps. > > TheõÅ;te> > Any ideas? > > Thanks. > > Chris >
From slash@ircd.it õÅ;JuReceived: from someone claiming to be rd-tp2.edisontel.com (root@rd-tp2.edisontel.com [62.94.0.67]) õÅ;uc for <cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net>; Mon, 16 Jul 2001 12:08:05 -0400 õÅ;elReceived-Date: Mon, 16 Jul 2001 12:08:05 -0400 Received: from work (62.94.255.66) by rd-tp2.edisonõÅ;co id 3B28D0CB00002DE1 for cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net; Mon, 16 Jul 2001 18:06:14 +0200 Message-ID: <01dd01ÛëÅ;11To: <cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net> References: <NFBBJIFGHMKFKMGMõÅ;IESubject: Re: number of BGP routes received and advertised Date: Mon, 16 Jul 2001 18:08:05 +0200 MIõÅ;erContent-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority:õÅ;maX-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4522.1200
On July 16õÅ;1,
> show ip bgp neig x.x.x.x rout
This show only routes accepted by your router. If you have some prefõÅ;isshow them.
You have to use sh ip bgp nei [ip] re, but this is sõÅ;rt
Regards, Max
From chris@chrislandõÅ; Received: from someone claiming to be gw.chrisland.net (cm61-18-144-148.hkcable.com.hk [61.18.1õÅ;48 by Puck.nether.net (8.11.4/8.9.3) with ESMTP id f6GGQ4A24311 for <cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net>; Mon, 16 Jul 2001 12:26:õÅ;04 (enVelope-from chris@chrisland.net) Received-Date: Mon, 16 Jul 2001 12:26:05 -0400 Received: from chrisland.net (superõÅ;.c by gw.chrisland.net (8.11.3/8.11.3) with ESMTP id f6GGPqP98545; Tue, 17 Jul 2001 00:25:52 +ÛëÅ; ( (EnvelopDate: Tue, 17 Jul 2001 00:25:52 +0õÅ;FrOrganization: Chrisland X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.76 [en] (Windows NT 5.0; U) X-Accept-Language:õÅ;pdTo: Raj Bansal <rbansal@aol.net> CC: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject: Re: number of BGP routes receiõÅ;anReferences: <NFBBJIFGHMKFKMGMOMAEIEEPCCAA.rbansal@aol.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii ContentõÅ;ns
ops... you are saying: Router#term length 0 Router#sh ip bgp nei xxx adv|re
capturing the above and dõÅ;"w
there are over 100k routes for full-routes. are you sure? ;)
Chris
Raj Bansal wrote: > > do a > show iõÅ;p > to show how many advertised > > do a > show ip bgp neig x.x.x.x rout > to see how many received > > õÅ;-O> From: Chris [mailto:chris@chrisland.net] > Sent: Monday, July 16, 2001 11:42 AM > To: cisco-nsp@pucõÅ;th Subject: number of BGP routes received and advertised > > Greetings, > > I would like to know how to find out nõÅ;r > and advertised to a peer. From "sh ip bgp nei xxx", the lines that are > closed are: > > <õÅ; >> <...> > Number of unicast/multicast prefixes received 774/0 >õÅ; d> 0 history unicast paths consume 0 bytes of memory > <...> >õÅ;bu> what it is sending. For received, the peer is sendõÅ;me> (by "sh ip bgp nei xxx received-routes"). I am only permitting some of > them (total=774) by route-maps. >õÅ;Th> > Any ideas? > > Thanks. > > Chris
From chris@chrislandõÅ; Received: from someone claiming to be gw.chrisland.net (cm61-18-144-148.hkcable.com.hk [61.18.1õÅ;48 by Puck.nether.net (8.11.4/8.9.3) with ESMTP id f6GGTHA25169 for <cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net>; Mon, 16 Jul 2001 12:29:õÅ;04 (enVelope-from chris@chrisland.net) Received-Date: Mon, 16 Jul 2001 12:29:18 -0400 Received: from chrisland.net (superõÅ;.c by gw.chrisland.net (8.11.3/8.11.3) with ESMTP id f6GGSUP98566; Tue, 17 Jul 2001 00:28:30 +ÛëÅ; ( (EnvelopDate: Tue, 17 Jul 2001 00:28:29 +0õÅ;FrOrganization: Chrisland X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.76 [en] (Windows NT 5.0; U) X-Accept-Language:õÅ;pdTo: Pegg Damon <Damon.Pegg@carrier1.com> CC: "'Raj Bansal'" <rbansal@aol.net>, cisco-nsp@puck.nether.nõÅ;ubReferences: <83189BAB0F57D411A1C400508B6AADBD0473885A@GBLON1S07> CoõÅ;t-Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Hi,
"sh ip bgp sum" only shows the number of routes tõÅ;itpeer and processed throught the route-map. It only shows 774 as in my example.
sh ip bgp nei xxx receivedõÅ;tewhich is >100k.
Thanks.
Chris
Pegg Damon wrote: > > The correct way is as follõÅ; >> for total received routes. For granular iõÅ;ma> > sh ip bgp neigh x.x.x.x received-routes > sh ip bgp neigh x.x.x.x advertised-routes > > But an õÅ;t > basically need to check how many it queues when the session õÅ;st> Other vendors have functionality to check advertised prefixes within the sh > ip bgp sum but alas not cisco. >õÅ;> > > From: Raj Bansal [mailto:rbansal@aol.net] > > Sent: 16 July 2001 16:55 > > To: cisco-nsp@puõÅ;et> > Subject: RE: number of BGP routes received and advertised > > > > > > do a > > show ip bgp neigh x.x.x.x adv >õÅ;o > > > > do a > > show ip bgp neig x.x.x.x rout > > to see how many received > > > > > > -----OrigõÅ; M> > From: Chris [mailto:chris@chrisland.net] > > Sent: Monday, July 16, 2001 11:42 AM > > To: cisco-nsp@puck.nõÅ;r.> >> > > > > > Greetings, > > > > I would like to know how to fõÅ;ou> > received from > > and advertised to a peer. From "sh ip bgp nei xxx", the > > lines that are >õÅ;lo> > > > <...> > > Prefix advertised 2361, suppressed 301, withdrawn 165 > > <...> > > Number of unicast/multiõÅ; p> > 0 denied but saved unicast prefixes consume 0 bytes of memory > > 0 history unicast paths cõÅ;me> > <...> > > > > but I don't think they are. For advertised, 2361-301-164 not equal to > > what it isõÅ;di> > (by "sh ip bgp nei xxx received-routes"). I am only > > permittõÅ;so>> > > > The routers are running 12.0.16S or S1. > > > > Any ideas? > > > > Thank> >
From mr_list@netzeroõÅ; Received: from someone claiming to be noc.netzero.net (www.nms.netzero.net [209.247.162.70]) bõÅ;ck for <cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net>; Mon, 16 Jul 2001 12:49:06 -0400 (eõÅ;opReceived-Date: Mon, 16 Jul 2001 12:49:06 -0400 Received: (qmail 11154 invoked from network); 1õÅ;l Received: from scream.wlv.netzero.net (HELO schlep.netzero.net) (209.247.163.9) by www with SMTP; 16õÅ; 2Message-Id: <5.1.0.14.2.20010716095322.028507a0@pop.netzero.net> X-Sender: mr_list@pop.X-MaDate: Mon, 16 Jul 2001 09:59:22 -0700 To: From: Ramin K <mr_õÅ;@nSubject: Re: number of BGP routes received and advertised In-Reply-To: <3B531590.E6BE99A4@chriReferMime-Version: 1.0 Content-TypeF
Today I'm seeing 100076, 99857, and 101868 routes from our transit providers.
Ramin
AõÅ;:2>ops... you are saying: >Router#term length 0 >Router#sh ip bgp nei xxx adv|re > >capturiõÅ;he> >there are over 100k routes for full-routes. are you sure? ;) > >Chris > >Raj Bansal wõÅ;: > >> > show ip bgp neigh x.x.x.x adv > > to show how many advertised > > > > do a > > show ip bgp neig x.x.x.x rõÅ;> > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Chris [mailto:chris@chrisland.net] > > Sent: MondaõÅ;ul> > To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net > > Subject: number of BGP routes received and advertised > > > > GrõÅ;ng> > > I would like to know how to find out number of BGP routes received from > > and advertised to a peer. From "shõÅ;bg> > closed are: > > > > <...> > > Prefix advertised 2361, suppressed 301, withdrawn 165 >õÅ;..> > > > 0 denied but saved unicast prefixes consume 0 bytes of õÅ;ry> > <...> > > > > but I don't think they are. For advertised, 23õÅ;01> > what it is sending. For received, the peer is sending me full routes > > (by "sh ip bgp nei xxx recõÅ;d-> > them (total=774) by route-maps. > > > > The routers are running 12.0.16S or S1õÅ;> > > > > Thanks. > > > > Chris
From signal@shreve.nõÅ;MoReceived: from someone claiming to be mercury.shreve.net (IDENT:root@mercury.shreve.net [208.206.õÅ;3] for <cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net>; Mon, 16 Jul 2001 12:56:4õÅ;40Received-Date: Mon, 16 Jul 2001 12:56:48 -0400 Received: from mercury.shreve.net (IDEõÅ;ig by mercury.shreve.net (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id LAA30676 for <cisco-nsp@puck.nõÅ;r.Date: Mon, 16 Jul 2001 11:56:47 -0500 (CDT) From: Brian <signal@shreve.net> To: <cisõÅ;spMessage-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.33.0107161155470.23960-100000@mercury.shreve.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-TypeõÅ;XTSubject: [nsp] ONS15190 compatible with 12000?
Does anyone know if OC12/STM4-SM-IR-4 line cardsõÅ;m is it two totally seperate cards?
Brian
--------------------BRian Feeny e:signal@shreve.net CCNP+Voice/ATM/Security p:318.NõÅ;rkShreveNet Inc. (ASN 11881)
From simonl@rd.bbc.cõÅ; Received: from someone claiming to be gateg.kw.bbc.co.uk (gateg.kw.bbc.co.uk [132.185.132.16]) õÅ;pu for <cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net>; Mon, 16 Jul 2001 13:00:34 -0400 õÅ;veReceived-Date: Mon, 16 Jul 2001 13:00:34 -0400 Received: from sunf0.rd.bbc.co.uk (ddmailgatõÅ;.b by gateg.kw.bbc.co.uk (8.11.2/8.11.2) with SMTP id f6GH0RC29281; Mon, 16 Jul 2001 18:00:28 +ÛëÅ; (ReAeived:Received: from sunf25 by sunf25õÅ;bbX-Mailer: exmh version 2.2 06/23/2000 with nmh-1.0.4 To: Brian <signal@shreõÅ;etSubject: Re: [nsp] ONS15190 compatible with 12000? In-Reply-To: Your message of "Mon, 16 õÅ;20 <Pine.LNX.4.33.0107161155470.23960-100000@mercury.shreve.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-TyõÅ;teDate: Mon, 16 Jul 2001 18:00:24 +0100 Message-Id: <10079.995302824@sunf25> From: Simon LockhartõÅ;mo
> >Does anyone know if OC12/STM4-SM-IR-4 line cards >from ONS15190's are compatible with 12000's? Or >isõÅ;tw
They're completely different.
Simon -- Simon Lockhart |INternet Engineering Manager | Fax: +44 (0)1737 839516 BBC InKingswood Warren,Tadworth,Surrey,UK | URL: http://support.bbc.co.uk/
From bcarter@family-õÅ;neReceived: from someone claiming to be mail.family-net.net (mail.family-net.net [209.144.36.4õÅ;by for <cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net>; Mon, 16 Jul 2001 14:41:43 -04õÅ;(eReceived-Date: Mon, 16 Jul 2001 14:41:43 -0400 Received: from family-net.net ([66.99.õÅ;02 by Mail.family-net.net (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id NAA16889 for <cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net>; Mon, 16 Jul 2001 13:50:25õÅ;00Message-ID: <3B5334E1.8040003@family-net.net> Date: Mon, 16 Jul 2001 13:39:29 -0500 From: Bill Carter <bcarter@famiõÅ;etUSer-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; m18) Gecko/20010131 Netscape6/6.01 X-Accept-Language: enÛëÅ;E-TContent-õÅ;sfSubject: [nsp] AAA local-override command
I have a customer who wants the functionality of this commandõÅ;a found at: http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/793/access_dial/security.html
However, I can't õÅ; awill not accept the command.
Customer has 3600 terrminating a PRI. RemotõÅ;fi3600 when T-1's fail. Home users Dial into the 3600 with either BRI or analog. They want the DDR roõÅ;s Dialin user to use Tacac's
Any suggestions how to do this
--
"You can say any foolõÅ;thand the dog will give you a look that says, 'My God, you're right! I never would've thought of that!'" -Dave
From ssprunk@cisco.cõÅ;MoReceived: from someone claiming to be cactus.cisco.com (cactus.cisco.com [161.44.19.100]) by pucõÅ;th for <cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net>; Mon, 16 Jul 2001 17:14:53 -0400 (envelõÅ;frReceived-Date: Mon, 16 Jul 2001 17:14:53 -0400 Received: from glock (dhcp-161-44-19-65.cisco.com [16õÅ;.1 by cactus.cisco.com (8.8.8+Sun/8.8.8) with SMTP id OAA29623; Mon, 16 Jul 2001 14:14:43 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <0õÅ;1cFrom: "Stephen Sprunk" <ssprunk@cisco.com> To: "Juan C. Verde" <jverde@red3i.es>, <cisco-nsõÅ;ckReferences: <Pine.GSO.4.32.0107091115420.24718-100000@sj-cse-425.cisco.com> <001501c10b95$0a05a7e0$0a02a8c0@WõÅ;RDSubject: Re: serial port operation above 2048Kbps for sat circuit Date: Mon, 16 Jul 2001 14:49:42õÅ;00MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-EncoõÅ;: X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4522.1200 X-MimeOLE: Produced By MicÛëÅ;fto Supports one port at 8 Mbps when used in NM-1FE1R2W, NM-1FE2ÛëÅ;M-that network module or 2600 chassis must not be used. o õÅ;poNM-2FE2W, or NM-2W or 2600 chassis WIC slots. All other WIõÅ;rtthAt network module or 2600 chassis must not be used.
In other words, the WIC serial controller in the later-model NõÅ;an
The WIC-1T is capable of a max sync speed of 2Mbps, sorry.
S
| | õÅ; :|: :|: Network Design Consultant, ANS :|||: .:|||||||:..:|||||||:. Email: ssprunk@cisco.com
--FTo: <cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net> Sent: Monday, July 16, 2001 0
> Hi Alfredo (nice to meet you here too :) > > > Well, a short search in cisco.com (man, do I love õÅ; seNgine) > > tells us that WIC-2T can't > > (http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/pcat/sewn__y2.htsure > >you > > Docs ab> chassis > ( http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/cc/pd/rt/2600/prodlit/2636m_ds.htm ) > you can see the troughpuõÅ;r 2Mbps > of older NMs, so I understand it could be theoretically possible to reach > hiõÅ; s> WIC-1T, assuming the card itself is able to d( WIC-2T is not supported in "old" -legacy- 3600 NMs). > > Cheers. > --> INSTRUMENTACION Y COMPONEÛëÅ;, Received: from someone claiming to be hades.uz (mrtg.netactive.net [196.22.160.34]) by puck.nether.neõÅ;.1 for <cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net>; Mon, 16 Jul 2001 18:20:03 -0400 (envelope-from deõÅ;deREceived-Date: Mon, 16 Jul 2001 18:20:03 -0400 Received: by hades.uz (Postfix on SuSE Linux 7.0 (i386), from userid õÅ; Date: Tue, 17 Jul 2001 00:19:59 +0200 From: Dmitri Kalintsev <dek@haõÅ;uzSubject: Re: [nsp] Cisco 36xx as a PE router with CoS Message-ID: <20010717001959.A13726@hõÅ;.uMail Followup-To: Dmitri Kalintsev <dek@hades.uz>, cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net References: <000801c10e04$a472a780$d412a8õÅ;QUMime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2õÅ;InX Class: Fast Return-Receipt-To: dek@hades.uz Precedence: special-delivery
On Mon, Jul 16, 2001 at 04:35:31AM -0400õÅ;dr> Hi, > > Has anyone expierence with using a Cisco 36xx as a PE router with CoS > (CBWFQ and WRED) imõÅ;en
I do. It works. ;)
SY, -- CCNP, CCDP (R&S) Dmitri E. Kalintsev CDPlayer@irc õÅ; dek @ connect.com.au phone: +61 3 9674 3913 fax: 9251 3666 http://-UNAVAIL- õÅ;N:
From dek@hades.uz MõÅ;ulReceived: from someone claiming to be hades.uz (mrtg.netactive.net [196.22.160.34]) by puck.nether.neõÅ;.1 for <cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net>; Mon, 16 Jul 2001 18:33:11 -0400 (envelope-from deõÅ;deREceived-Date: Mon, 16 Jul 2001 18:33:11 -0400 Received: by hades.uz (Postfix on SuSE Linux 7.0 (i386), from userid õÅ; Date: Tue, 17 Jul 2001 00:33:07 +0200 From: Dmitri Kalintsev <dek@haõÅ;uzSubject: Re: [nsp] Which IOS for 7206VxR, NPE-400, C7200-I/O-2FE/E Message-ID: <2001071700õÅ;.BMail-Followup-To: Dmitri Kalintsev <dek@hades.uz>, cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net References: <Pine.LNX.4.33.0õÅ;61Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-DispositõÅ; iUSer-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.33.0107161334170.16240-100000@netmon.netvision.net.il>; from elijahõÅ;viX-Class: Fast Return-Receipt-To: dek@hades.uz Precedence: special-delõÅ;y > I am currently running 12.0(15)S3 on 7200VxR with NPE-400õÅ; >> > I have a terrible packet loss on both ethernet ports whenever they > are participatinõÅ; s> > Did anyone came across such an oddity? > Can anyone recommend õÅ;OS
Yes, this is known bug with 2FE I/O card. Problem is with private particle buffers. 2port FE õÅ; hbuffers of that size. When FE runs out of private buffers, it cannot reõÅ;t many of them, and as a result of the later, many õÅ; pDon't try to increase private particle buffers number using "buffers ..." command - it does not work.õÅ;rethere's an interim release to fix that (we've been given this interim release, õÅ; nI/O card and I'm not happy to play with untested interim relõÅ;s prodUction router). So in general, I have a suspicion that fix will only be available on 12.2 train (at
Have fun, -- CCNP, CCDP (R&S) Dmitri E. Kal dek @ connect.com.au phone: +61 3 9674 3913 fax: 9251 3666 http://-UNAVAIL- UIN:7150410
From joey@q7.com MoõÅ;l Received: from someone claiming to be q7.q7.com (joey@q7.q7.com [208.187.215.242]) by puck.nether.net õÅ;1. for <cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net>; Mon, 16 Jul 2001 20:39:30 -0400 (envelope-from joeyõÅ;coReceIved-Date: Mon, 16 Jul 2001 20:39:30 -0400 Received: from localhost (joey@localhost) by q7.q7.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) wiõÅ;SM for <cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net>; Mon, 16 Jul 2001 17:39:28 -0700 (PDT) Date: Mon, 16 Jul 2001 17:39:28 -07õÅ;PDFrom Joe Pruett <joey@q7.com> To: <cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net> Message-ID: <Pine.GSO.4.33.0107161736170.11608-100000@q7õÅ;coMIME Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Subject: [nsp] qwest dsl over ds3 vs. cisco 7206+pa3-2t3
õÅ;ththings:-).
can anyone say if you can interact with qõÅ; d7200? it appears to only support atm-dxi, and i don't know if qwest does that. further, it seeõÅ;haat least).
do i have a disaster on my hands here? or am i just in need of n
From grr@shandakor.tõÅ;isReceived: from someone claiming to be shandakor.tharsis.com (IDENT:root@shandakor.tharsisõÅ; [ by puck.nether.net (8.11.4/8.9.3) with ESMTP id f6H1KQA13786 for <cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net>; Mon, 16 JulõÅ;1 (envelope-from grr@shandakor.tharsis.com) Received-Date: Mon, 16 Jul 2001 21:20:26 -0400 Received: (from gõÅ;ocDate: Mon, 16 Jul 2001 2õÅ;:0From: George Robbins <grr@shandakor.tharsis.com> Message-Id: <200107170119.VAA27556@shandakoTSubject: Re: [nsp] qwest dsl over ds3 vs.
You're going to need eitõÅ;an
ATM breaks nice packets into crappy little cells, so an additional layer of hardware supõÅ; ito get "this is header/data" packets that any router would want to work with. 8-)
õÅ;3-on the line framing, vpi/vci ranges and numbers of PVC's thaõÅ;u
George
> Date: Mon, 16 Jul 2001 17:39:28 -0700 (PDT) > From: Joe Pruett <joey@q7.com> > To: <cisÝëÅ;sp> > now that the circuit is due in tomorrow,õÅ;ec> things:-). > > can anyone say if you can interact with qwest dsl with the 2t3 card in a > õÅ;? > that. further, it seems that atm-dxi can't do ppp oõÅ;at> at least). > > do i have a disaster on my hands here? or am i just in need of last > night's ios buildõÅ; >From chris@chrislandõÅ; Received: from someone claiming to be gw.chrisland.net (cm61-18-144-148.hkcable.com.hk [61.18.1õÅ;48 by Puck.nether.net (8.11.4/8.9.3) with ESMTP id f6H2cQA15936 for <cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net>; Mon, 16 Jul 2001 22:38:õÅ;04 (enVelope-from chris@chrisland.net) Received-Date: Mon, 16 Jul 2001 22:38:26 -0400 Received: (from chris@localhost) bõÅ;.c Tue, 17 Jul 2001 10:36:29 +0800 (HKT) (envelope-from chris@chrisland.net) õÅ;: From: Chris Fung <chris@chrisland.net> To: Ramin K <mr_list@netzero.net> Cc: cisco-nsp@pucõÅ;thSubject: Re: number of BGP routes received and advertised Message-ID: <20010717103628.A2578@gw.chriReferMime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i InõÅ;lyYup,Chris
On Mon, Jul 16, 2001 at 09:59:22AM -0700, Ramin K wrote: > Full > > Today I'mõÅ;in> > Ramin > > At 12:25 AM 7/17/01 +0800, Chris wrote: > >õÅ;..> >Router#term length 0 > >Router#sh ip bgp nei xxx adv|re > > > >capturing the above and do a "wc -l" inõÅ;X?> there are over 100k routes for full-routes. are you sure? ;) > > > >Chris > > > >Raj Bansal wrote: > > > > > > doõÅ; >> > > to show how many advertised > > > > > > do a > > > show ip bgp neig x.x.x.x rout > õÅ;to> > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: Chris [mailto:chris@chrisland.net] > > > Sent: MõÅ;y,> > > To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net > > > Subject: number of BGP routes received and advertised > õÅ;> > > > > > > I would like to know how to find out number of BGP routes received from > > > and advertised toõÅ;ee> > > closed are: > > > > > > <...> > > > Prefix advertised 2361, supprõÅ;d > > > <...> > > > Number of unicast/multicast prefixes received 774/0 > > > 0 denied but saved unicõÅ;pr> > > 0 history unicast paths consume 0 bytes of memory > > > <...> > > > > > > but I dõÅ; t> > > what it is sending. For received, the peer is sending me õÅ; r>> > > them (total=774) by route-maps. õÅ;> > > > > > > Any ideas? > > > > > > Thanks. > > > > > > Chris >
From jared@puck.nethõÅ;etReceived: (from jared@localhost) by puck.nether.net (8.11.4/8.9.3) id f6H3R9517624 for cisco-õÅ;pu (envelope-from jared) Resent-Message-Id: <200107170327.f6H3R9517624@puck.nõÅ;r.ReCeived: (from slist@localhost) by puck.nether.net (8.11.4/8.9.3) id f6H3KvG17542 for jared; Mon, 16 Jul 2001 23:2õÅ; - (Envelope-from cisco-nsp-request@puck.nether.net) Date: Mon, 16 Jul 2001 23:20:57 -0400 X-From_: iyerrs@hotmail.com õÅ; JReceived: from someone claiming to be hotmail.com (f40.law4.hotmail.com [216.33.149.40]) by puck.neõÅ;.n for <cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net>; Mon, 16 Jul 2001 23:20:56 -0400 (envelope-õÅ; iReceived-Date: Mon, 16 Jul 2001 23:20:56 -0400 Received: from mail pickup service by hotmail.com with MõÅ;so Mon, 16 Jul 2001 20:19:55 -0700 Received: from 164.100.21.161 by lw4fd.law4.hotmail.msn.com with HTTP; Tue, õÅ;ulX-Originating-IP: [164.100.21.161] From: "mani ramachandran" <iyerrs@hotmail.com> To: cisco-nsp@puck.neõÅ;.nOld-Date: Tue, 17 Jul 2001 03:19:55 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed Message-ID: <F40P9FekzabõÅ;dGX-OriginalArrivalTime: 17 Jul 2001 03:19:55.0866 (UTC) FILETIME=[5A1663A0:01C10E6F] X-Diagnostic: ÝëÅ;onResent-Date: Mon, 16 Jul 2001 23:27:09 -0400 õÅ;ntSubject: [nsp]
Hi! There is a prob.. in my HDLC link between two cisco routers which are õÅ;ne
When I ping the router point to point link the ping time shown is around 1500/1650 and normal shõÅ; bI have check when there is no other traffic on the router.. The link speed is 128k The router is 2611.õÅ;av2509 also, result is same. The CPU load is nearly 0% and the there is notõÅ;ererrors. all the counters seem normal ...
Can someone some more tests..????
Iyer
_____________õÅ;__Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmai\20õÅ;m.Received: from someone claiming to be look-to-windward.complicity.co.uk (look-to-windward.comõÅ;it by puck.nether.net (8.11.4/8.9.3) with ESMTP id f6H81HA22091 for <cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net>;õÅ;, (envelope-from ryan@complicity.co.uk) Received-Date: Tue, 17 Jul 2001 04:01:17 -0400 Received:õÅ;m id 15MPmq-0005DV-00; Tue, 17 Jul 2001 09:00:56 +0100 õÅ;: From: "Ryan O'Connell" <ryan@complicity.co.uk> To: Bill Carter <bcarter@family-net.net> CcÝëÅ;scMessage-ID: <20010717090056.A20050@look-tõÅ;ndReferences: <3B5334E1.8040003@family-net.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=uõÅ;ciUser-Agent: Mutt/1.2i In-Reply-To: <3B5334E1.8040003@family-net.net>; from bcarter@family-neõÅ;t
On Mon, Jul 16, 2001 at 01:39:29PM -0500, Bill Carter wrote: > Customer has 3600õÅ;rm> 3600 when T-1's fail. Home users Dial into the 3600 with either BRI or õÅ;al> Dialin user to use Tacac's > > Any suggestions how tõÅ; t
DiAler profiles (Not Legacy DDR) will do this. Create a Virtual-Template interface for the home users and seperate diõÅ; iremote sites. Authentication on each can be set differently.
-- Ryan O'Connell - <ryan@complicõÅ;co
I'm not losing my mind, no I'm not changing my lines, I'm just learning new things wit
From gert@greenie.muõÅ; Received: from someone claiming to be greenie.muc.de (root@greenie.muc.de [193.149.48.161]) byõÅ;k. for <cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net>; Tue, 17 Jul 2001 05:18:10 -0400 (enõÅ;peReceived-Date: Tue, 17 Jul 2001 05:18:10 -0400 Received: by greenie.muc.de via rmail with stdiõÅ;d for cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net; Tue, 17 Jul 2001 11:18:36 +0200 (MEST) (Smail-3.2 1996-JõÅ; #Received: (from gert@localhost) by mobile.greenie.muc.de (8.11.0/8.11.0) id f6H8HOx04090; Tue, 17 Jul 2õÅ;10Date: Tue, 17 Jul 2001 10:17:24 +0200 From: Gert Doering <gert@greenie.muc.de> To: Dmitri Kalintsev <dek@hadeÖëÅ;>,Message-ID: <20010717101724.ÖëÅ;7@hade,Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-õÅ;<2X-mgetty-docs: http://alpha.gre\17õÅ;.n
Hi,
On Tue, Jul 17, 2001 at 12:33:07AM +0200, Dmitri Kalintsev wrote: > Yes, this is known bug with 2FE I/O cõÅ; P> buffers. 2port FE card has 768-byte particle buffers but there's no public > buffers of õÅ; s> any from public pool and as a result you will get ignores anõÅ;ro many of them, and as a result of the later, many very pissed-off customers.
Interesting indeed. Haven't seen anõÅ;ngethernet traffic is just too well-behaving?
(0 ignores and 22 throttles on 2253181745 input packeõÅ;dobad to me)
gert -- Gert Doering Mobile communications ... right now writing from *@home* ... mobile phoõÅ;+4
From mr_list@netzeroõÅ; Received: from someone claiming to be noc.netzero.net (www.nms.netzero.net [209.247.162.70]) bõÅ;ck for <cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net>; Tue, 17 Jul 2001 05:51:29 -0400 (eõÅ;opReceived-Date: Tue, 17 Jul 2001 05:51:29 -0400 Received: (qmail 22766 invoked from network); 1õÅ;l Received: from laptop1.sjc.netzero.net (HELO schlep.netzero.net) (208.184.153.46) by www with SMTP; õÅ;ulMessage-Id: <5.1.0.14.2.20010717025927.02d25a90@pop.netzero.net> X-Sender: mr_list@pop.netzero.net X-ÖëÅ;erTo: Chris Fung <chris@chrisland.net>, cisco-nsõÅ;ckFrom: Ramin K <mr_list@netzero.net> Subject: Re: number of BGP routes received and advertised In-Reply-To: <20õÅ;17References: <5.1.0.14.2.20010716095322.028507a0@pop.netzero.net> <NFBBJIFGHMKFKMGMOMAEIEEPÖëÅ;.rMime-Version: 1.0õÅ;te
There is that nice little line at the then end of either õÅ;hotwo"| include Total" onto to the command.
RõÅ;
>Hi, > >Yup, I know that. But back to my original questions: how to obtain tõÅ; > >Regards, >Chris > >On Mon, Jul 16, 2001 at 09:59:22AM -0700, Ramin K wÖëÅ;: > proviõÅ;. > >> > > > At 12:25 AM 7/17/01 +0800, Chris wrote: > > >ops... you are saying: > > >Router#term length 0 > > >RõÅ;r#> > > > > >capturing the above and do a "wc -l" in UNIX? > > > > > >there are over 100k routes foõÅ;ll> > > > > >Chris > > > > > >Raj Bansal wrote: > > > > > > > > do a > > > > show ip bgp neigh x.õÅ;x > >> > > > > > > > do a > > > > show ip bgp neig x.x.x.x rout > > > > to see how manyõÅ;ei> >> > > > -----Original Message----- > > > > From: Chris [mailto:chris@chrisland.net] > > > > Sent: Monday, JulyõÅ; 2> > > > To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net > > > > Subject: number of BGP routes received and advertised > > > > >õÅ; >> > > > > > > > I would like to know how to find out number of BGP routes received from > > > > and advertisedõÅ;a > > > > closed are: > > > > > > > > <...> > > > > Prefix advertised õÅ;, > > > > <...> > > > > Number of unicast/multicast prefixes received 774/0 > > > > 0 deniõÅ;ut> > > > 0 history unicast paths consume 0 bytes of memory > > > > <...õÅ;> > >> > > > what it is sending. For receivõÅ;th> > > > (by "sh ip bgp nei xxx received-routes"). I am only permitting some of > > > > tõÅ;(t> > > > > > > > The routers are running 12.0.16S or S1. > > > > > > > > Any ideas? > > > > > > > õÅ;an> >> > > > Chris > >
From kf@reign.sk TuõÅ;l Received: from someone claiming to be reign.sk (w31nb048.via.at [194.96.201.48]) by puck.nether.net (8õÅ;4/ for <cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net>; Tue, 17 Jul 2001 06:19:24 -0400 (envelope-from kf@reigõÅ;) X-Server: Advanced Direct Remailer (www.elcomsoft.com) ReplTo: "'Dmitri Kalintsev'" <dek@hades.uz>, <cisco-nsp@pucDate: Tue, 17 Jul 2001 12:19:14 +0200 Message-ID: <000201c10ea9$ef007110$01010101@reign.sk>õÅ;E-Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMailõÅ;orX-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook CWS, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2911.0) X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.45õÅ;20In-Reply-To: <20010717003307.B13726@hades.uz>
hummm....strange... I'm running on the VXR/400/2FE as õÅ; cas system 120-17.S1 Using ISL ...and no probs.. no more traffic than 15 Mbit/s I've tryed to looõÅ;d CSCdu19229 dependend of the protocols running... but thought so is noõÅ;is12.2 only?? Do you have the bug id? Thnx..
I õÅ;d
Alex
-----Original Message----- From: Dmitri Kalintsev [mailto:d቏;adQent: TSubject: Re: [nsp] Which IOS fo
On Mon, Jul 16, 2001 at 01:46:48PM +0300, Elijah Kagan wrote: > C7200-I/O-2FE/E IO controller. > > I have a terrible packet loss on both ethernet ports whenever they > arõÅ;rtutilization. > > Did anyone came across such an oddity? > Can anyoõÅ;ec
Yes, this is known bug with 2FE I/O card. Problem is with private particle buffeõÅ;2pbuffers of that size. When FE runs out of private buffers,õÅ;caany from public pool and as a result you will get ignores and throttles, many of them, and as a result of theõÅ;erDon't try to increase private particle buffers number using "buffers ..." command - it dõÅ;nothere's an interim release to fix that (we've been given this inteõÅ;reI/O card and I'm not happy to play with untesteõÅ;teproduction router). So in general, I have a suspicion that fix will only be available on 12.2 train (at leõÅ;in
Have fun, -- CCNP, CCDP (R&S) Dmitri E. Kalintsev CDPlayer@irc õÅ;et dek @ connect.com.au phone: +61 3 9674 3913 fax: 9251 3666 http://-UNAVAIL- UõÅ;15
From pfs@sj-core.cisõÅ;omReceived: from someone claiming to be sj-msg-core-1.cisco.com (sj-msg-core-1.cisco.com [171.7õÅ;3. bY puck.nether.net (8.11.4/8.9.3) with ESMTP id f6HAlrA28962 for <cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net>; Tue, 17 Jul 2001 06:4õÅ; - (Envelope-from pfs@sj-core.cisco.com) Received-Date: Tue, 17 Jul 2001 06:47:53 -0400 Received: from sj-msg-av-1.ciscõÅ;m by sj-msg-core-1.cisco.com (8.11.3/8.9.1) with ESMTP id f6HAljH27090; Tue, 17 JuàëÅ;01 by sj-msg-av-1.cisco.com (8.10.1/8.10.1) wõÅ;ES Tue, 17 Jul 2001 03:47:53 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pfs-laptop.cisco.com (ssh-syd1.cisco.com [64.10õÅ;3.Message-IõÅ;5.X-Sender: philsmit@localhost X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.1 DatõÅ;ueTo: "mani ramachandran" <iyerrs@hotmail.com> From: Philip Smith <pfs@cisco.com> Subject: Re: õÅ;] In-Reply-To: <F40P9FekzabtneqdGSy00006ef8@hotmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: textõÅ;in
It sounds as though your satellite provider has added another satellite-groundstatioõÅ;p a few times before... Can you check that they haven't pulled this on you? õÅ;suWhat about connectivity beyond the router - is thaõÅ;15you tried swapping routers at the other end?
Some ideas for you....
philip --
At 23:20 16/07/2001 -õÅ;, >Hi! >There is a prob.. in my HDLC link between two cisco routers which are >connected by satellõÅ;li> >When I ping the router point to point link the ping time shown is around >1500/1650 and normal should be around 53õÅ;0m>I hAve check when there is no other traffic on the router.. >The link speed is 128k >The router is 2611. I have even cõÅ;ed>2509 also, result is same. >The CPU load is nearly 0% and the there is not interface rõÅ;s >errors. >all the counters seem normal ... > > >Can someone some more tests..???? > >Iyer > > >_______________õÅ;__>Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmailFrom chris@chrislandõÅ; Received: from someone claiming to be gw.chrisland.net (cm61-18-144-148.hkcable.com.hk [61.18.1õÅ;48 by Puck.nether.net (8.11.4/8.9.3) with ESMTP id f6HDUqA31554 for <cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net>; Tue, 17 Jul 2001 09:30:õÅ;04 (enVelope-from chris@chrisland.net) Received-Date: Tue, 17 Jul 2001 09:30:52 -0400 Received: from chrisland.net (superõÅ;.c by gw.chrisland.net (8.11.3/8.11.3) with ESMTP id f6HDUEP05970; Tue, 17 Jul 2001 21:30:15 +àëÅ; ( (EnvelopDate: Tue, 17 Jul 2001 21:30:14 +0õÅ;FrOrganization: Chrisland X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.76 [en] (Windows NT 5.0; U) X-Accept-Language:õÅ;pdTo: Ramin K <mr_list@netzero.net> CC: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject: Re: number of BGP routes receõÅ; aReferences: <5.1.0.14.2.20010716095322.028507a0@pop.netzero.net> <NFBBJIFGHMKFKMGMOMAEIEEPCCAA.rbansal@aolàëÅ;> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Hi Ramin,
It will dump all thàëÅ;ut
ChrõÅ;Ra> > There is that nice little line at the then end of either of those > two commands the says "TotaõÅ;mb> "| include Total" onto to the command. > > Ramin >
From bri@sonicboom.oõÅ;TuReceived: from someone claiming to be cx175057-a.ocnsd1.sdca.home.com (cx175057-a.ocnsd1.sdca.homõÅ;m by puck.nether.net (8.11.4/8.9.3) with ESMTP id f6HGB9A03062 for <cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net>; Tue, 17 JulõÅ;1 (envelope-from bri@sonicboom.org) Received-Date: Tue, 17 Jul 2001 12:11:09 -0400 Received: from Brian (cx1õÅ;7- by cx175057-a.ocnsd1.sdca.home.com (8.11.1/8.11.1) with SMTP id f6HGB7A97087 for õÅ;co (envelope-from bri@sonicboom.org) Message-ID: <005d01c10edb$õÅ;23From: "Brian" <bri@sonicboom.org> To: <cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net> Date: Tue, 17MIME Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-TX-Priority: 3 X-MSMaiõÅ;ioX-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4522.1200 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4522.1200 SàëÅ;cthttp://puck.nether.net/cisco-ns
From KWortendyke@TimõÅ;dgReceived: from someone claiming to be toc1mail.Timebridge.com ([63.210.58.234]) by puckõÅ;he for <cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net>; Tue, 17 Jul 2001 13:08:46 -0400 (enveloõÅ;roReceived-Date: Tue, 17 Jul 2001 13:08:46 -0400 Received: by toc1mail.timebridge.com with IntõÅ;t id <3Z08K33A>; Tue, 17 Jul 2001 13:08:35 -0400 Message-ID: <2FB8213C2B8AD411803F00D0B7741B0C6CõÅ;@tFrom: "Wortendyke, Ken" <KWortendyke@Timebridge.com> To: "Ciscp NSP List (E-mail)"Date: Tue, 17 Jul 2001 13:08:34 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: InterContent-Type:õÅ;t/ charset="iso-8859-1" Subject: [nsp] 7500 Questions
Good afternoon all,
I need some 7500 specific information... õÅ; DLLQ, FRF.12 and FRTS? The modules in
2. Can the interfaces migrate to a VIP4 module and PA's witho
3. Should the 750õÅ;t of LAN connections for H.323 video? If so, why?
4. Any key featureõÅ;atthe WAN side in this scenario?
Thanks for the thoughts and comments,
From michael@mlbarroõÅ;m Received: from someone claiming to be happy-pill.mlbarrow.com (cx662778-b.santab1.ca.home.com õÅ;5. by puck.nether.net (8.11.4/8.9.3) with ESMTP id f6HHxlA08638 for <cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net>; Tue, 17 Jul 2001 õÅ;9: (envelope-from michael@mlbarrow.com) Received-Date: Tue, 17 Jul 2001 13:59:47 -0400 Received: from mlbarrow.com õÅ;nn by happy-pill.mlbarrow.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id KAA01767 for <cisco-nsp@pucõÅ;thMessage-ID: <3B547DFE.39DCF62A@mlbarrow.com> Date: Tue, 17 Jul 2001 11:03:42 -070õÅ;omOrganization: mlbarrow.com X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.76 [en] (Windows NT 5.0; U) X-õÅ;ptMIME-Version: 1.0 To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-õÅ;diSubject: [nsp] Cisco NM-1CT1 for 2600/3600...
Is there any other way to use this card other than for bringing inõÅ;RI
-- Michael L. Barrow <michael@mlbarrow.com>
From grr@shandakor.tõÅ;isReceived: from someone claiming to be shandakor.tharsis.com (IDENT:root@shandakor.tharsisõÅ; [ by puck.nether.net (8.11.4/8.9.3) with ESMTP id f6HJ1XA12789 for <cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net>; Tue, 17 JulõÅ;1 (envelope-from grr@shandakor.tharsis.com) Received-Date: Tue, 17 Jul 2001 15:01:34 -0400 Received: (from gõÅ;ocDate: Tue, 17 Jul 2001 1õÅ;:3From: George Robbins <grr@shandakor.tharsis.com> Message-Id: <200107171901.PAA17909@shandakoTSubject: Re: [nsp] Cisco NM-1CT1
It'll work perfectly fine õÅ; nfull or fractional t1...
George
> Subject: [nsp] Cisco NM-1CT1 for 2600/3600... > ReseõÅ;ro> X-Mailing-List: <cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net> archive/latest/7251 > X-Loop: cisco-nsp@puck.neõÅ;.n> PrEcedence: list > Resent-Sender: cisco-nsp-request@puck.nether.net > > Is there any other way to use this card otheõÅ;an> (as 23 serial ports) of data into the router? > > -- > Michael L. Barrow <michael@mlbarrow.com>Received: from someone claiming to be hades.uz (mrtg.netactive.net [196.22.160.34]) by puck.nether.neõÅ;.1 for <cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net>; Tue, 17 Jul 2001 18:47:52 -0400 (envelope-from deõÅ;deREceived-Date: Tue, 17 Jul 2001 18:47:52 -0400 Received: by hades.uz (Postfix on SuSE Linux 7.0 (i386), from userid õÅ; Date: Wed, 18 Jul 2001 00:47:47 +0200 From: "'Dmitri Kalintsev'" <deõÅ;deTO: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject: Re: [nsp] Which IOS for 7206VxR, NPE-400, C7200-I/O-2FE/E Message-ID: <200107àëÅ;47 cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net RefereMime-Version: 1.0 CCoõÅ;t-User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <000201c10ea9$ef007110$01010101@reign.sk>; from kf@reign.sk on TuõÅ;ulX-Class: Fast Return-Receipt-To: dek@hades.uz Precedence: special-delivery
Ok, here we go. õÅ;'s
CSCdu09746 Add support for dynamic particle pools to i82543 GE/FE/E driver
I cannot qõÅ; t
My controller was:
Slot 0: Dual FastEthernet (RJ-45) I/O Card PoõÅ;da Port adapter is analyzed Port adapter insertion time 1d11h ago EEPROM contents at haõÅ;re Hardware Revision : 1.1 Top Assy. Part Number : 800-07114-02 Part Number õÅ; Board Revision : A0 PCB Serial Number : <skipped> ;) RMA HistoryõÅ; Fab Version : 02 Fab Part Number : 28-3455-02 Product Number õÅ;
Tried both with 12.0(16)S and 12.2(1) and 12.2(1a). Problem would manifest when incoming traffic woulõÅ;ac(last statement is important, because if your downstream interfaces are quick eõÅ;h the problem).
SY, -- CCNP, CCDP (R&S) CDPlayer@irc Network Architect @ connect.com http://-UNAVAIL- UIN:7150410 cell: +61 414 821 382
On Tue, Jul 17, 2001 at hummm....strange... > I'm running on the VXR/400/2FE > as boot c7200-> as system 120-17.S1 >õÅ;ng> no more traffic than 15 Mbit/s > I've tryed to look and search for such bug but no info...just foõÅ;ol>> issue....what is weird for me, that õÅ;uc> 12.2 only?? Do you have the bug id? Thnx.. > > I would like to see sh controler fast 0õÅ;/1> > Alex > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Dmitri Kalintsev [mailto:dek@hades.uz] > Sent: TuesõÅ; J> To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net > Subject: Re: [nsp] Which IOS for 7206VxR, NPE-400, C7200-I/O-2FE/EõÅ;> > > I am currently running 12.0(15)S3 on 7200VxR with NPEõÅ; a> > C7200-I/O-2FE/E IO controller. > > > > I have a terrible packet loss on both ethernet ports whenever they > > are põÅ;ci> utilization. > > > > Did anyone came across such an oddity? > > CanõÅ;on> > Yes, this is known bug with 2FE I/O card. Problem is with private partiõÅ;> > buffers of that size. When FE runs out of priõÅ; b> any from public pool and as a result you will get ignores and throttles, > many of them, and aõÅ;re> Don't try to increase private particle buffers number using "buffers õÅ; >> there's an interim release to fix that (we'õÅ;ee> release, bu I never tested it, because I have RMA'd my 2FE-I/O for single FE > I/O card and I'm notõÅ;py> production router). So in general, I have a suspicion that fix will only be >õÅ;il> > Have fun, > -- > CCNP, CCDP (R&S) DmitriõÅ;Ka> CDPlayer@irc Network Architect @ connect.com.au > dek @ connect.com.au phone: +61 3 9674 3913õÅ;: > http://-UNAVAIL- UIN:7150410 cell: +61 414 821 382 > ---end quoted text---
-- CCNP, CCDP (R&S)õÅ; CDPlayer@irc Network Architect @ connect.com.au dek @ connect.com.õÅ; http://-UNAVAIL- UIN:7150410 cell: +61 414 821 382
From jared@puck.nethõÅ;etReceived: (from jared@localhost) by puck.nether.net (8.11.4/8.9.3) id f6IFBAE05905 for cisco-âëÅ;puResent-Message-Id: <200107181511.f6IFBAE05905@puck.nõÅ;r.ReCeived: (from slist@localhost) by puck.nether.net (8.11.4/8.9.3) id f6IFAc605880 for jared; Wed, 18 Jul 2001 11:1õÅ; - (Envelope-from cisco-nsp-request@puck.nether.net) Date: Wed, 18 Jul 2001 11:10:38 -0400 X-From_: Richard.Thornton@isõÅ;a.Received: from someone claiming to be mail.csa.scot.nhs.uk (relay1.csa.scot.nhs.ukõÅ;5. by puck.nether.net (8.11.4/8.9.3) with ESMTP id f6IFAYA05857 for <cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net>; Wed, 18 Jul 20õÅ;1: (envelope-from Richard.Thornton@isd.csa.scot.nhs.uk) Received-Date: Wed, 18 Jul 2001 11:10:35 -0400 Received:õÅ;ma id <3GCS5MD0>; Wed, 18 Jul 2001 16:10:25 +0100 Message-ID: <3õÅ;57From: "Thornton, Richard" <Richard.Thornton@isd.csa.scot.nhsõÅ; TOld-Date: Wed, 18 Jul 2001 16:08:43 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (õÅ;26Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" X-Diagnostic: Not on the accept list X-Envelope-To: cisco-nsp ResenõÅ;omResent-Date: Wed, 18 Jul 2001 11:11:10 -0400 Resent-To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject: [nsp] CõÅ; I
Guys
Sorry to bother you all, do any of you know where I can source the latest IOS updates in the UâëÅ;th
I want to enhance the QoS capabilities of my Cisco 2620 someone must have had a problem like this inõÅ; U
Cheers
Richard
_________________________________________________________________ Common Services õÅ;cy
The information contained in this message may be confidential or legally privileged and is intended for theõÅ;reIf you have received this message in error or there are any problems please notify the originator immediatelõÅ;Thmessage is strictly forbidden. ___________________________õÅ;__
From ibrahim@davnet.õÅ;sgReceived: from someone claiming to be donovan1.mbox.davnet.com.sg (64-014.davnet.com.sg [202.õÅ;4. by puck.nether.net (8.11.4/8.9.3) with ESMTP id f6IHJ7A14530 for <cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net>; Wed, õÅ;ul (envelope-from ibrahim@davnet.com.sg) Received-Date: Wed, 18 Jul 2001 13:19:07 -0400 Received: from õÅ;hi (Post.Office MTA v3.5.3 release 223 ID# 1017-70743U1000L100S0V3õÅ; Thu, 19 Jul 2001 01:19:00 +0800 From: "Ibrahim" <ibrahimõÅ;neTo: "Cisco-Nsp" <cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net> Subject: PA-GE on 7200 Date: Thu, 19 Jul 2001 01:20:45 +0800 MessageõÅ; <MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; bounX-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Importance: Normal X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2462.0000 X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
Hi,
Can't find in Cisco website wether PA-GEõÅ;72dot1q). Any URL or anyone experience with it ?
thanks in advance Ibrahim
Content-Type: application/ms-tnef; name="winmail.daContentõÅ;po filename="winmail.dat"
eJ8+Ii0RAQaQCAAEAAAAAAABAAEAAQeQBgAIAAAA5AQAAAAAAADoAAEIgAcAGAAAAElQTS5NaWNy õÅ;ZnA5AGAHAFAAAlAAAACwACAAEAAAALACMAAAAAAAMAJgAAAAAACwAâëÅ;AAAAACAR0MAQAAABsAAABTTVRQOõÅ;kF360PwQECAQoOAQAAABgAAAAAAAAAEqxtcw79vxG2kV5ydyVQHcKAAAALAB8OAQAAAAIBCRABAAAAâëÅ;AAsGV0MCAHEwKAfQqBknYIkHdrC4BkNAxgPmIEMEAAWgIEh3ZWIAkHRlFkF0AmgEkCBQQS1HRRogAiAgAcERUHN1cAJwCKEkMU0wXkAXAZG90MQhxKS4RõÅ;IFxBbwAHBrBCBxFcFhZHYAcBvwE8RJ8GJyYWgHcBy/HQsR4QIAIdAAAAsAAIAIIAYAAAAAAMAAAAAâëÅ;BGAADAAAAAAAAARgAAAABShQAAJ2oBAB4ACYAIIAYAAAAAAMAAAõÅ;ABADkuMAAeAAqACCAGAAAAAADAAAAAAAAARgAAAAA2hQAAAQAAAAEAAAAAAAAAHgALgAggBgAAAAAA wAAAAAAAAEYAAAAAN4UAAAEâëÅ;BAAAAAAADAAAAAAAAARgAAAAAOhQAAAAAAAAMAHoAIIAYAAAAAâëÅ;AAJVAdAgH6DwEAAAAQAAAAEqõÅ;79CAArKlbCAABQU1RQUlguRExMAAAAAAAAAABOSVRB+b+4AQCqADfZbgAAAEM6XERvY3VtZW50câëÅ;bmc29mdFxPdXRsb29rXG91dGxvb2sucHNTFBCQkxHSkJFTU5PQktGR0ZPT0FNRU1FRUdBQS5pYnJhaGltQGRhdmBhBZfLx6AwAHEHsAAAADAâëÅ;AAW
------=_NextPart_000_006B_01C10FF1.093AADA0--
From mivens@clara.neõÅ;edReceived: from someone claiming to be shaft.noc.clara.net (shaft.noc.clara.net [195.8.70.216]) byõÅ;k. for <cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net>; Wed, 18 Jul 2001 14:03:05 -0400 (eõÅ;opReceived-Date: Wed, 18 Jul 2001 14:03:05 -0400 Received: by shaft.noc.clara.net (Postfix, from usõÅ; 1 idDate: Wed, 18 Jul 2001 19:03:03 +0100 From: Mark Ivens <mivens@clõÅ;neTo: Ibrahim <ibrahim@davnet.com.sg> Cc: Cisco-Nsp <cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net> Subject: Re: PA-GE on 7200 Message-ID: <2õÅ;71References: <LPBBLGJBEMNOBKFGFOOAMEMEEGAA.ibrahim@davnet.com.sg> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type:õÅ;t/Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <LPBBLGJBEMNOBKFGFOOAMEMEEGAA.ibrâëÅ;@dX-NCC-RegID: uk.claranet
Thus spake IbõÅ;m
> Can't find in Cisco website wether PA-GE on 7200 support VLAN trunk (ISL or > dot1q). Any URL õÅ;ny
http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/pcat/gget__a1.htm
Both .1q and ISL are listed in the feõÅ;e
-- ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Mark Ivens mivens@clara.net "ClarõÅ;ts Systems Administrator paws" - David Bowie, "8 Line Poem" ClaraNET UK Ltd 020 7903 3203õÅ; ----------------------------------------------------------------------
From jared@puck.nethõÅ;etReceived: (from jared@localhost) by puck.nether.net (8.11.4/8.9.3) id f6J0TXu29182 for cisco-õÅ;pu (envelope-from jared) Resent-Message-Id: <200107190029.f6J0TXu29182@puck.nõÅ;r.ReCeived: (from slist@localhost) by puck.nether.net (8.11.4/8.9.3) id f6INJms27677 for jared; Wed, 18 Jul 2001 19:1õÅ; - (Envelope-from cisco-nsp-request@puck.nether.net) Date: Wed, 18 Jul 2001 19:19:48 -0400 X-From_: rajib@dampened.net õÅ; JReceived: from someone claiming to be mx0.arlg01.inetaddr.net (freefall.damage.net [204.0.80.50]) bõÅ;ck for <cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net>; Wed, 18 Jul 2001 19:19:47 -0400 (õÅ;loReceived-Date: Wed, 18 Jul 2001 19:19:47 -0400 Received: from [204.0.80.132] (helo=meltdown.daõÅ;ed By mx0.arlg01.inetaddr.net with esmtp (Exim 3.15 #4) id 15N0ba-000056-00 for cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net; Wed, 18 JõÅ;00Message-Id: <5.1.0.14.2.20010718181840.033b7428@mx0.arlg01.inetaddr.net> X-Sender: rajib@mx0.arlg01.inetaõÅ;neX-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.1 Old-Date: Wed, 18 Jul 2001 18:19:45 -0500 To: cisco-nsp@puck.õÅ;erFrOm: Rajib Rashid <rajib@dampened.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowedõÅ;iaX-Envelope-To: cisco-nsp Resent-From: jared@puck.nether.net Resent-Date: Wed, 18 Jul 2001 õÅ;9:Resent-To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject: [nsp] cisco dhcp client feature question
Hello...
With 12.1(?)T, õÅ;o (ie. supports "ip address dhcp"). However, the client identifier or hoõÅ;nacisco-mac.mac.mac-fe0/1). My question is, is there any wayõÅ;ovclient-id, and if not, is there any plans to do so? Some DHCP servers provide reservations using the client-õÅ;ns
TIA:)
From dek@hades.uz WõÅ;ulReceived: from someone claiming to be hades.uz (mrtg.netactive.net [196.22.160.34]) by puck.nether.neõÅ;.1 for <cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net>; Wed, 18 Jul 2001 21:59:29 -0400 (envelope-from deõÅ;deREceived-Date: Wed, 18 Jul 2001 21:59:29 -0400 Received: by hades.uz (Postfix on SuSE Linux 7.0 (i38 Date: Thu, 19 Jul 2001 0Subject: Re: [nsp] cisco dhcp client feature question Message-ID: <20010719035924.D14368@hõÅ;.uMail Followup-To: Dmitri Kalintsev <dek@hades.uz>, cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net References: <5.1.0.14.2.20010718181840.03õÅ;28Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-AgõÅ; MIn-Reply-To: <5.1.0.14.2.20010718181840.033b7428@mx0.arlg01.inetaddr.net>; from rajib@dampened.net on Wed, Jul õÅ;20X-Class: Fast Return-Receipt-To: dek@hades.uz Precedence: special-delivery
On Wed, Jul 18, 2001 atõÅ;19> Hello... > > With 12.1(?)T, Cisco introduced DHCP client support on ET/FE interfaces õÅ;e.> name field in the DHCP requests are automatically õÅ;ra> cisco-mac.mac.mac-fe0/1). My question is, is there any way to override this > client-id, and if not, is thereõÅ; p> provide reservations using the client-id instead of usual mac address.
ll-isdn-test#cõÅ;t ll-isdn-test(config)#int f0/0 ll-isdn-test(config-if)#ip addõÅ;p <cr>
ll-isdn-test(config-if)#^Z ll-isdn-test#sh ver | incl ^IOS IOS (õÅ;54RELEASE SOFTWARE (fc1)
SY, -- CCNP, CCDP (R&S) âëÅ; dek @ connect.com.au phoneõÅ;1 http://-UNAVAIL- UIN:7150410 cell: +61 414 821 382
From afort@staff.webõÅ;raReceived: from someone claiming to be bnc.powerup.com.au (bnc.webcentral.com.au [202.õÅ;23 by puck.nether.net (8.11.4/8.9.3) with ESMTP id f6J2BCA01033 for <cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net>; Wed, 18 Jul 2001 2õÅ;:1 (envelope-from afort@staff.webcentral.com.au) Received-Date: Wed, 18 Jul 2001 22:11:13 -0400 Received: by bnc.webõÅ;ra id <3SNCB5K9>; Thu, 19 Jul 2001 12:11:09 +1000 Message-ID: <415DD4BF903õÅ;1AFrom: Andrew Fort <afort@staff.webcentral.com.au> To: "'Dmitri Kalintsev'" âëÅ;@hDate: Thu, 19 Jul 2001 12:11:08 õÅ;0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Yes, but õÅ;br FastEthernet FastEthernet IEEE 802.3 Fddi ANSI X3T9.5 Port-channelõÅ;he
-afort
>-----Original Message----- >From: Dmitri Kalintsev [mailto:dek@hades.uz] >Sent: ThursõÅ; 1>To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net >Subject: Re: [nsp] cisco dhcp client feature question > > >On Wed, JuõÅ;, >> Hello... >> >> With 12.1(?)T, Cisco introduced DHCP client support on ETõÅ; >>> (ie. supports "ip address dhcp"). However, the client >identifier or host >> name field in the DHCP requeõÅ;ar>> cisco-mac.mac.mac-fe0/1). My question is, is there any way >to override this >> clienõÅ;, >DHCP servers >> provide reservations using the client-id instead of usualõÅ;ac> >ll-isdn-test#conf t >Enter configuration commands, one per line. End with CNTL/Z. >ll-isdn-test(config)#int õÅ; >> client-id Specify client-id to use > <cr> > >ll-isdn-test(config-if)#^Z õÅ;ll>IOS (tm) 5400 Software (C5400-IS-M), Version 12.2(2)XA, EARLY >DEPLOYMENT >RELEASE SOFTWARâëÅ;c1>SY >-- > CDPlayer@irc Network ArchiteõÅ; c> dek @ connect.com.au phone: +61 3 9674 3913 fax: 9251 3666 > http://-UNAVAIL- UIN:7150410 ce>
From dek@hades.uz WõÅ;ulReceived: from someone claiming to be hades.uz (mrtg.netactive.net [196.22.160.34]) by puck.nether.neõÅ;.1 for <cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net>; Wed, 18 Jul 2001 23:17:28 -0400 (envelope-from deõÅ;deREceived-Date: Wed, 18 Jul 2001 23:17:28 -0400 Received: by hades.uz (Postfix on SuSE Linux 7.0 (i38 Date: Thu, 19 Jul 2001 0TO: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject: Re: [nsp] cisco dhcp client feature question Message-ID: <20010719051725.E143õÅ;adMail-Followup-To: 'Dmitri Kalintsev' <dek@hades.uz>, cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net References: <415DD4BF903BD311A3D900âëÅ;9FContent-Disposition: inliõÅ;seIn-Reply-To: <415DD4BF903BD311A3D900A0C99F9022096070FA@bnc.webcentral.com.au>; from afort@staff.webceõÅ;l.X-Class: Fast Return-Receipt-To: dek@hades.uz Precedence: special-deliveryõÅ;m,cannot really use his sweet c1sc0 box to get his hõÅ;ne@Home. ;) Back to using Linux box then. ;) (Sorry, couldn't resist) ;)
SY, -- CCNP, CCDP (R&S) õÅ; CDPlayer@irc Network Architect @ connect.com.au dek @ connect.com.au põÅ;: http://-UNAVAIL- UIN:7150410 cell: +61 414 821 382
On Thu, Jul 19, 2001 at 12:âëÅ;8P> FastEthernet FastEthernõÅ;EE> Fddi ANSI X3T9.5 > Port-channel Ethernet Channel of interfaces > > -afort > > >-----Original Message-õÅ; >> >Sent: Thursday, 19 July 2001 11:59 AM > >To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net >õÅ;bj> > > > > >On Wed, Jul 18, 2001 at 07:19:48PM -0400, Rajib Rashid wrote:õÅ;> > >> > >> With 12.1(?)T, Cisco introduced DHCP client support on ET/FE > >interfaces > >> (ie. supports "ip adõÅ;s > >identifier or host > >> name field in the DHCP requests are automatically generated (eg. õÅ;> > >to override this > >> client-id, and if not, is there any õÅ;s > >DHCP servers > >> provide reservations using the client-id instead of usual > >mac address. > > > >llõÅ;n-> >Enter configuration commands, one per line. End with CNTL/Z. > >ll-isdn-test(config)#int f0/0 > >ll-isdn-tõÅ;co> > client-id Specify client-id to use > > <cr> > > > >ll-isdn-test(config-if)#^Z > >lõÅ;dn> >IOS (tm) 5400 Software (C5400-IS-M), Version 12.2(2)XA, EARLY > >DEPLOYMENT > >RELEASE SOFTWAõÅ;fc
From sgilly@servicomõÅ;.cReceived: from someone claiming to be truth.servicom2000.com (qmailr@truth.servicom2000.comõÅ;2. by puck.nether.net (8.11.4/8.9.3) with SMTP id f6J7PDA07467 for <cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net>; Thu, 19 Jul 200õÅ;:2 (envelope-from sgilly@servicom2000.com) Received-Date: Thu, 19 Jul 2001 03:25:13 -0400 Received: (qmail 11051 õÅ;keReceived: from top.servicom2000.com (HELO SGILLY) (212.101.64.178) by truth.õÅ;icFrom: "Sonya Gilly" <sgilly@servicom2000.com> To: "Cisco-Nsp" <cisco-nsp@õÅ;.nDate: Thu, 19 Jul 2001 09:26:49 +0200 Message-ID: <CCEMIJDFDAJONOAECOMJGEAPCDAA.sgilly@servicomMIME-VCOntent-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0008_X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-õÅ;ilX-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2911.0) X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5õÅ;41Importance: Normal Subject: [nsp] Access list in 4908
This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
------=_NextPõÅ;00Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Hi all,
We are õÅ;g configured access lists in Gigabit interfaces. We have found a limõÅ;iothE TCAM (Ternary Content Addressable Memory) when trying to import a long access list with many conditions.
After iõÅ;asaccess list but we don't know how much available space thereõÅ;fomore access lists or conditions. With the "show sdm size" command you can see the size for each region, but not tõÅ;se
Could you tell me a way to know the number of access lists we can add or the available space?
Can weõÅ;cufollowing condicion: permit tcp any host x.x.x.x eq wwõÅ;ow"1" or a "0"?
Thanks in advance, Sonya Gilly
----õÅ;NeContent-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding<HTML><HEAD> <MET<META content=3D"MSHTML 5.50.4616.200" name=3DGENERATOR></HEAD> <BODY> <DIV><FONT face=3D"Gill SaâëÅ;T"<DIV><FONT face=3D"Gill Sans MT"õÅ;orclass=3D856364406-19072001></SPAN></FONT> </DIV> <DIV><FONT face=3D"Gill Sans MT" color=õÅ;00class=3D856364406-19072001>We are doing some tests with 4908G-L3 and = 2948G-L3=20 switches and haveõÅ;fifound a=20 limitation in the TCAM (Ternary Content Addressable Memory)âëÅ;n to=20<DIV><FONT face=3D"Gill Sans MT" colorâëÅ;00<DIV><FONT face=3D"Gill Sans MT" color=3D#000õÅ;siclass=3D856364406-19072001>After increasing the SDM size for Access = List, we could=20 configure the longõÅ;p;space=20 there is for adding more access lists or conditions. With the õÅ;w sIze"=20 command you can see the size for each region, but not the used and free=20 entries.</SPAN></FONT></DIV> <DIâëÅ;ON<DIV><FONTõÅ;e=class=3D856364406-19072001>Could you tell me a way to know the number oõÅ;aclists we can add or the available space?</SPAN></FONT></DIV> <DIV><FONT face=3D"Gill Sans MT" color=3D#000080âëÅ;e=c<DIV><FONT face=3D"Gill Sans MT" color=3D#000080 size=3õÅ;SPcLass=3D856364406-19072001>Can we calculate the space that access lists = are using?=20 For example, in the followinõÅ;nd<DIV><FONT face=3D"Gill Sans MT" color=3D#000080 size=3D2><SPAN=20 class=3D856364406-19072001>&õÅ;;&x.x.x.x eq=20 www</SPAN></FONT></DIV> <DIV><FONT face=3D"Gill Sans MT" cclass=3D856364406-19072001></SPAN></FONT> </DIV> <DIV><FONT faclaSs=3D856364406-19072001>how many bytes are used? Is the "permit" = entered just=20 as it is or it is a "1" or a "0"õÅ;PA<DIV><FONT face=3D"Gill Sans MT" color=3D#000080 size=3D2><SPAN=20 class=3D856364406-19072001></SPAN></FONõÅ;bs<DIV><FONT face=3D"Gill Sans MT" color=3D#000080 size=3D2><SPAN=20 class=3D856364406-19072001>Thanks in advance,<õÅ;N><DIV><FONT face=3D"Gill Sans MT" color=3D#000080 size=3D2><SPAN=20 class=3D856364406-19072001>Sonya Gilly</SõÅ;</
------=_NextPart_000_0008_01C11034.F01A16F0--
From jared@puck.nethõÅ;etReceived: (from jared@localhost) by puck.nether.net (8.11.4/8.9.3) id f6JDJ9S11543 for cisco-õÅ;pu (envelope-from jared) Resent-Message-Id: <200107191319.f6JDJ9S11543@puck.nõÅ;r.ReCeived: (from slist@localhost) by puck.nether.net (8.11.4/8.9.3) id f6J6Zwt07110 for jared; Thu, 19 Jul 2001 02:3õÅ; - (Envelope-from cisco-nsp-request@puck.nether.net) Date: Thu, 19 Jul 2001 02:35:58 -0400 X-From_: jamesky@hotmail.comõÅ;u Received: from someone claiming to be hotmail.com (f57.law4.hotmail.com [216.33.149.57]) by puck.nõÅ;r. for <cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net>; Thu, 19 Jul 2001 02:35:57 -0400 (envelopeõÅ;m Received-Date: Thu, 19 Jul 2001 02:35:57 -0400 Received: from mail pickup service by Wed, 18 Jul 2001 23:35:50 -0700 Received: from 52.128.30.14 byX-Originating-IP: [52.128.30.14] From: "James Caasi" <jamesky@hotmail.com> To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.neõÅ;d-Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed Message-ID: <F57USzbAUfKRfõÅ;zfX-OriginalArrivalTime: 19 Jul 2001 06:35:50.0366 (UTC) FILETIME=[0D243FE0:01C1101D] X-Diagnostic: NoÓëÅ; tResent-Date: Thu, 19 Jul 2001 09:19:09 -0400 ReõÅ;-TSubject: [nsp] Connection to PABX
Hi all,
We have a meridian 1 PABX and it has a QPC536õÅ;Mbconnecting to a DVM-MFT-E1 on a 3810. We are changing the router to a 3662. What would be the appropriateõÅ;d VWIC-MFT-E1 or VWIC-MFT-G.703? What is their difference?
Thanks.
_________õÅ;__Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun Aug 04 2002 - 04:12:45 EDT